Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Blame Canada

There's something rotten in the state of Canada.

And I don't just mean Celine Dion's singing.

The Guardian/s George Monbiot is one of the most renowned environmentalists on the planet. So disgusted is he at Canada's refusal to do its bit to tackle climate change, that he has broken his vow not to fly and gone to Toronto.
So here I am, watching the astonishing spectacle of a beautiful, cultured nation turning itself into a corrupt petro-state. Canada is slipping down the development ladder, retreating from a complex, diverse economy towards dependence on a single primary resource, which happens to be the dirtiest commodity known to man. The price of this transition is the brutalisation of the country, and a government campaign against multilateralism as savage as any waged by George Bush.
Until now I believed that the nation that has done most to sabotage a new climate change agreement was the United States. I was wrong. The real villain is Canada. Unless we can stop it, the harm done by Canada in December 2009 will outweigh a century of good works.
Ouch. Those nice polite Canadians won't like that.

Monbiot explains that Canada is pushing against any kind of deal on climate change, because any such deal will harm Canada's dirty fuel industry. He describes a particularly unpleasant oil extraction process:
Canada is developing the world's second largest reserve of oil. Did I say oil? It's actually a filthy mixture of bitumen, sand, heavy metals and toxic organic chemicals. The tar sands, most of which occur in Alberta, are being extracted by the biggest opencast mining operation on earth. An area the size of England, comprising pristine forests and marshes, will be be dug up – unless the Canadians can stop this madness. Already it looks like a scene from the end of the world: the strip-miners are creating a churned black hell on an unimaginable scale.
To extract oil from this mess, it needs to be heated and washed. Three barrels of water are used to process one barrel of oil. The contaminated water is held in vast tailings ponds, some so toxic that the tar companies employ people to scoop dead birds off the surface. Most are unlined. They leak organic poisons, arsenic and mercury into the rivers. The First Nations people living downstream have developed a range of exotic cancers and auto-immune diseases.
Refining tar sands requires two to three times as much energy as refining crude oil. The companies exploiting them burn enough natural gas to heat six million homes. Alberta's tar sands operation is the world's biggest single industrial source of carbon emissions. By 2020, if the current growth continues, it will produce more greenhouse gases than Ireland or Denmark. Already, thanks in part to the tar mining, Canadians have almost the highest per capita emissions on earth, and the stripping of Alberta has scarcely begun.
So remember, people, blame Canada. Have you kicked a Canadian today? They won't mind. They're too polite to complain.

4 comments:

  1. It's not even a real country anyway!

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a Canadian living in New Zealand (but in Canada at the moment), thanks for flagging this. More people need to be aware of what's going on here. More can be seen in the documentary H2Oil, if you're interested.

    Always a pleasure to read your blog, by the way.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gee, I just hope George Monbiot has not been reading fellow Guardian journo Fred Pearce's exposes of New Zealand's pathetic lack of emissions reductions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. One would hope. Both countries sell themselves on the fetishizing of the purity of their great outdoors, meanwhile exploit natural resources to the detriment of that very same environment. Myths abound.

    ReplyDelete

I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:

1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.