If National wishes to win the PR battle over Conservation mining they could start by explaining to us in clear terms what the economic benefits are. If they can't they should drop the plan until they can get their story straight. Their story continues to change, and its holes are bigger than an open cast mine.
And another thing - carping on about how many mining consents Labour granted on Conservation land won't work. How many mining consents did Labour grant over Schedule 4 land?
How many?
If you're goimg to employ lies, you should at least make them good ones.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
1 comments:
I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:
1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. I am thick-skinned, thanks to years of serving my reptilian overlords, but I won't tolerate abusive comments. Feel free to criticise the substance of what I have written, provided your criticism is intelligent and constructive. Don't abuse me or other commenters.
3. Please don't defame people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If we don't agree with Gerry, we are just "emotive" so our views don't count.
ReplyDelete"carping on about how many mining consents Labour granted on Conservation land won't work",
but it is quite fun goading Chris Carter about having personally approved the Pike River COAL Mine...
http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2010/03/23/the-economic-value-of-keeping-our-conservation-estate-protected/#comments
Heh Heh Heh