Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Ten Things We Now Know About Mining The Conservation Estate


  1. The direct economic benefits to New Zealand from mining are at best uncertain. The numbers pedalled by National in favour of opening up Conservation lands to mining don't appear to stack up. The assumptions made about the value of these precious minerals are heroic at best. And let us not forget we don't actually know how many of these precious minerals there are. The Government figures are based on guesswork. 
  2. National must think the public are fools. Without any sense of shame, the Government today trotted out the same figures in favour of mining that others had demolished days ago. Maybe they thought nobody would notice.
  3. Nobody in Government has done any analysis of the potential damage that could be caused to New Zealand's image overseas. John Key (the Tourism Minister!) as much as admitted this in Parliament. The damage to New Zealand's tourism industry could be potentially devastating. Tourists come to New Zealand because they perceive it as being an unspoilt wilderness. Now we all know that's very far from the truth, but in tourism perception is everything. Being savaged by the Economist magazine is not what the industry needs.
  4. Some people (the usual suspects) are claiming there is a hidden agenda behind the moves to open up Conservation land to mining. I don't buy tales of hidden agendas and secret plans. Stupidity and blinkered ideology are usually perfectly adequate explanations for poor decision-making. Key and co aren't necessarily trying to reward their mining mates. They just don't give a shit about the things many others care passionately about - like the environment, conservation and our natural heritage.
  5. Opposition to these moves is growing steadily. I expect we will see a backdown of sorts. Maybe the plan will be scaled back or quietly dropped.  John Key needs to get a puppy, or smile more. Maybe then we won't notice.
  6. Gerry Brownlee is barely competent, and his arrogance is offensive. And he has no understanding of the opposition he is facing. He is not the man to sell this policy.
  7. Nobody believes the mining industry's claims that modern mining techniques are surgical.  The problem with any type of mining is that there is always going to be a big hole in the ground, and a great big pile of crap dug out that needs to be put somewhere.  And there need to be roads built as well. And a water source. And somewhere to put wastewater and machinery and trucks etc etc.
  8. If surgical mining is anything like surgical bombing, I strongly recommend that all wedding parties get the hell off Great Barrier Island before the miners start digging.
  9. Even if the mining industry can convince the public that mining can be done "surgically" (good luck on that), how can we be sure that the only mining operations allowed will be "surgical" ones? The Government's "just trust us" approach doesn't give me any comfort. And if the decision's to be left to the Environment Court, that leaves uncertainty.
  10. If this is National's plan to close the income gap with Australia, we're screwed.

3 comments:

  1. Richard LeckingerMarch 25, 2010 at 9:15 AM

    You're so right fish. I particularly like the idea of getting all wedding parties as far from the mines as possible.

    They won't be mining Great Barrier for reasons you have mentioned. No electricity and no water. Duh!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whilst I agree with all these points, I particularly like point 10. Which also raises the question - what does closing the income gap look like? Cos, if its anything to do with the minium wage, there's is $14.31. Ours is what? $12.75??? And Don Brash and his cronies want our minimum wage to drop. Go figure

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love (6). Gerry is such a gift to the environmental movement. He really is a chunky version of the bad dude in Avatar.
    Can I add (11)?
    Digging up coal in Paparoa National Park? WTF?? Coal is concentrated carbon dioxide, the stuff growing in the atmosphere causing global temperature to increase. Jim Hansen says "if you want your grandchildren to inherit a stable planet, leave the bloody coal in the ground".

    ReplyDelete

I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:

1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.