- Did ACT make you their Corrections spokesman because you contemplated serving time in a Tongan jail and would be well qualified?
- Did you tell the NZ Law Society about your assault conviction before you resumed practice in New Zealand?
- If not, why not?
- Was it your call not to include common assault as a strike offence?
- Why did you keep your conviction a secret?
- Is there anything else we should know about?
- You claim you're appealing (in 2010) a conviction dating from 2002. Things may well move slowly in Tonga but, seriously, eight years? Why should we believe you?
- You claim you didn't do anything wrong, and your party leader says he believes you. If this phantom appeal fails, does that mean he was wrong, or is the Tongan court wrong?
- Do you agree that a $10 fine is an adequate punishment for someone found guilty of assault?
- Do your friends at the Sensible Sentencing Trust agree?
Monday, September 13, 2010
Ten Questions For David Garrett
Labels:
ACT,
David Garrett,
Three strikes law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:
1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.