Monday, May 31, 2010

Everything's Okay Because John Says It Is

It's apparently okay for someone representing the nation to use a racist word in public, so long as he apologises afterwards. Not immediately, but only after being harassed, hounded and cornered by journalists, and after initially showing no remorse. And by "apologise", I mean apologise for the offence - not the racism behind the remark.

Making an apology of that kind is like saying "well I'm sorry you're so prickly and sensitive and that my plain talking offended you. But, really, toughen up."

It's also apparently okay for someone representing the nation to use a racist word, because someone else did so once upon a time and was forgiven by the public
"Paul Holmes effectively used the same term, did actually apologise and the public accepted that."
I consider myself a member of the group John Key calls "the public", but I don't recall ever forgiving Paul Holmes for his "cheeky darkie" remark. However, if John Key says I did, then I must have.

I'm not sure how Key would know. He might have been within earshot when I said "I forgive that poor Holmes chap. He's been through enough." But I've only ever been in the same vicinity as John Key twice: once when I saw him crossing the road nearby (before he became all, like, famous and stuff), and once when he and his minders walked right past me in the lobby of my building. I'm pretty sure on both occasions I kept my lips sealed.

So the only other possibility is that I'm talking in my sleep and his men are bugging me. I've no doubt that my highly subversive blogging activities ("Down with that kind of thing! Death to all extremists!") have got the attention of the SIS, and they of course report directly to the PM. On a hunch I ransacked my bedroom in the hope of finding where they'd planted the bug, but all I got for my troubles was an evil glare from my wife.

But I did find a few missing socks and a plastic Lego man my son's been missing for weeks. So thanks to the SIS for that, I guess.

If I am talking in my sleep it seems strange I would be dreaming about Paul Holmes. On the other hand, what other explanation could there be? It also seems strange I would continue to harbour a lingering ill-will towards a man I have supposedly forgiven. Maybe forgiving someone is like taking a course of antibiotics: if you don't complete the entire course, the disease comes back. Perhaps if I'd just avoided all contact with Paul Holmes' work for the full ten day treatment I'd now be an ardent admirer of the man.

All that is by the bye. Key says Holmes has been embraced in a loving way by a public keen to show their affections towards the small wizened one, and Key's word has to be good enough for me.

Quite what Holmes' redemption has to do with Andy Haden, however, is still beyond me. Holmes was the host of a commercial radio show. Haden was appointed by the Government to represent New Zealand, and his job title even has the word "ambassador" in it.

Our ambassadors are supposed to be paragons of dignity and discretion - or at least that is the image we expect them to convey, even if behind closed doors they are ordinary dirty sinful folk just like the rest of us. But they don't let the screen drop like Haden did. A momentary lapse can be forgiven, but Haden's conduct afterwards suggests it was no mere lapse.
One slip, and down the hole we fall
It seems to take no time at all
A momentary lapse of reason
That binds a life for life
A small regret, you won't forget,
There'll be no sleep in here tonight
If only.

Parents The Losers In Early Childcare Funding Cuts

For many people the Budget was all about tax cuts.

If they have pre-school kids they may have heard about plans to axe the top subsidy rate for childcare centres with more than 80% qualified teachers.

But Key's purring about the size of everyone's tax cuts probably reassured them they would be no worse off after those tax cuts took effect.

Wrong. Many people with young children and on middle-to-low incomes will be significantly worse off under the childcare funding changes.

The Dom Post this morning reports:
One Porirua childcare centre has already warned parents they face $50 a week more in fees after the Government axed the top subsidy for the 20 hours early childhood education scheme in its annual Budget.
And centres around the country are doing their sums, with the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) warning that the shortfall will be passed on to parents, with some facing up to $60 extra a week.
So what's the Government's response to that?
But Education Minister Anne Tolley said those numbers were "speculation" and many centres were likely to decide against fee increases. Mr Key said tax cuts, announced in the May 20 Budget, meant middle- and low-income earners would not be worse off, even after a 2.5 per cent GST increase.
Note how she didn't say the numbers were wrong. There's nothing "speculative" about a centre increasing its fees by $50 per week. That is real. And more will follow.

So if you're on a low-to-middle income and have pre-school kids, your GST increase will burn into most of your tax cut. What is left will probably go towards funding childcare increases, but that won't be enough.

At least National is reverting to its traditional role. Almost all of the major policies initiatives in the last fifteen years to help struggling families have come from Labour: Working For Families, the 20 hours early childhood education scheme, free doctor visits for children under six. There are no doubt others.

This could hurt National - once these increases start hitting pockets, and once Labour moves away from the pointless and self-destructive politics of petty scandal.

Labour should remember the famous Bill Clintion quote (no, not the "I did not have sex with that woman" one). He famously said "It's the economy, stupid." That's something Labour appears to have forgotten.

Most people don't care about John Key's blind trust. But people will care about Key's performance as PM if they discover they are financially worse off.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

I Bet You Anything That McCully Fires Andy Haden

So I expect Haden's been so totally fired as a rugby ambassador. I bet you McCully told him in no uncertain terms that the language Haden used was insulting and offensive. I bet McCully tore strips off the guy before booting him to touch.

Hmmm, what's this?
A public apology from Andy Haden over comments he made during the week has been accepted by Rugby World Cup Minister Murray McCully, and the former All Black remains an ambassador for the 2011 Rugby World Cup.
No f**king way!
Mr McCully said: "If we were to take out everyone who made a mistake and shoot them we'd sooner or later run out of people to do things in this country. We just have to accept that a mistake was made, it's been addressed by Mr Haden and I'm satisfied to leave it there."
Who said anything abut shooting the guy? His comments were idiotic and offensive, and he continued to spout racist crap when interviewed by TV3 a day or so later. Hardly a slip of the tongue then.

But if we must start shooting people who make mistakes, let's start near the top of the heap. What about the RWC Minister? Of course, that assumes he can be harmed by bullets. And silver ones are hard to come by.
He said Haden had initially apologised for offending people, and had reaffirmed that with another one today "and that addresses the key point of concern from the Government's perspective".
So he's only apologised for the offence, not for the racist nature of the comments. i.e. "I'm still a racist, but I'm deeply sorry if that offends you."
Mr McCully said people in a role such as Haden's needed to understand there was a high level of scrutiny attached.

"It's not something that Mr Haden had given enough thought to. This experience will have caused him some pain.
Well diddums.

Haden should have been sacked. But then with Mordor McCuly making the call, can anyone be surprised by this decision? Perhaps he thinks Haden resonates with the "common man".

I heard the Rugby Union's CEO, Steve Tew on the radio the other day. He wouldn't say what he wanted to happen to Haden, but the inference was clear. McCully's decision will probably have pissed him off.

It's probably also pissed off most of the Canterbury rugby public. So at least there's a silver lining.

There Should Be A Rehab For Bloggers

I was thinking just the other day about Lindsay Lohan and Cameron Slater (aka Whaleoil).

One is a mediocrity who has drawn more public attention than their meagre talents deserve, and whose self-destructive behaviour has become so commonplace it's tedious. 

The other's just a lousy actress.

Slater's in the news again - with no money, no house, in trouble with the law, and with a family at their wit's end.

The best thing Slater could do is take a break from the online world and get well.

If he took a break I'm sure he'd find the world a better place. The blogosphere certainly would be.

Not For Me

I won't be nominating this blog for the so-called "Air New Zealand Best Blog Award". But nor do I intend to agonise for too long over the decision, unlike others.

In doing so I feel like a bit of a fraud, having told another blogger that there was nothing to lose by entering. But I changed my mind. I can do that, because I'm not a politician, and if it makes me look inconsistent, what exactly can you do about it?

But I don't mind or care if others want to nominate themselves.

Let me explain briefly the grounds for my decision.
  • If I won the fame would go to my head. I'd be like those obnoxious English rugby supporters after their team won the World Cup in 2003. They know their team was a tired, clapped-out unit who nobody likes, but that just spurs them on to goad you even more.
  • Of course I won't win, so why bother? There are many better bloggers than me out there.
  • Trying to find four blogposts from last year that I really like and stand up well sounds just too hard. Sometimes when I write stuff I think "hey that was really clever," and then I look back a week later and think "f**k me, what was I on when I wrote that?" But the only reason I'd delete a post would be for legal reasons, or if I really stepped over the line and said something stupidly offensive. So the dross stays up there with the good stuff.
  • It's hard to take seriously any award where the judges include two angry left-wingers at the extreme end of the spectrum (one of whom was imprisoned for putting an axe through Helen Clark's electoral office window), a right-winger for whom I have nothing but contempt, and some other guy I've never heard of. I have no desire to be judged by any of these people.
  • Entering a competition that uses the trade marks of one of my biggest clients without permission, and that is almost certainly in breach of the Fair Trading Act [Oops! See update below] and the tort of passing off, would not be the smartest career move.
Admittedly the first three grounds are pretty lame, and merely go to show I'm too lazy to trawl through my archive.  But the other two grounds won't go away.

Update: Before some smartarse points it out for me, I'm not sure on reflection that the Fair Trading Act applies in this situation. Because I'm not sure whether the misleading and deceptive conduct I was thinking about is occurring "in trade". Just as well I'm not a litigator, eh?

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Labour's Spectacular Own Goal

Tracy Watkins explains why better than I could.

I suspect the public recognise a beat-up when they see one, and the next set of polls will probably reflect that.

And Pete Hodgson needs to find another political party. He was a liability during Labour's last term, and has the uncanny knack of finding landmines to tread on.  

Labour's only hope for 2011 is if Hodgson defects to National.

From The Archives: Amnesty International Global Report 121BC – Rome

TVNZ is celebrating 50 years of mostly average programming. This is a mostly average blog with a tendency to copy anything that has worked for others, and I know a bandwagon when I see one. But before I hop aboard let me assure you I have no intention of simply regurgitating some of the execrable crap written from time to time on this site (and shame on you for even reading that stuff).

Instead let us delve into the archives of history, like a big delving thing, and look at some of the top stories of the past.

Episode I: This week Amnesty International issued its 2010 report on the state of human rights. The usual suspects, such as China, get a grilling for their appalling humans rights records and lack of legal process.

But what were they saying about the big players in the past? I chose a year at random to examine, 121BC Have things changed much? Let’s take a look.

The Report - Rome

Rome continues to be a shining beacon of civilisation and stability in a region of the world that has traditionally been prone to savage human rights abuses.

But a few minor issues need to be addressed.

Rome continues to make extensive use of the death penalty, and torture and detention without trial remain commonplace.

Freedom of religion is severely curtailed in Rome, and the public worship of any deities other than Roman ones is prohibited.

Women, the poor and slaves continue to have almost no civil rights. Slavery is widespread, and the entire economy relies on the forced labour of slaves.

Roman authorities have continued to clamp down on freedom of expression and assembly. Agrarian land reform advocates have been detained or, in some cases, even killed in the streets.

The lack of action on agrarian reform remains deeply concerning. This has led to widespread violence, and most recently led to a bloodbath in which one of the peoples’ representatives, Gaius Gracchus, committed suicide, while many of his supporters were murdered.

Especially worrying was the unprecedented invoking of draconian powers by the Roman senate under a Senatus Consultum Ultimum, a legislative instrument authorising the consuls Lucius Opimius and Quintus Fabius Maximus Allobrogicus, to crush the unrest. It is believed that up to 3000 of Gaius Gracchus’ followers may have been killed in the fighting that followed, and in the criminal trials that eventuated. Most trials suffered from a complete lack of judicial due process.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time Rome’s political leadership has taken drastic steps to crush a popular movement. In 133 BC the brother of Gaius Gracchus, Tiberius, was murdered by elements from the Senate, after also pushing for agrarian reform. The senate and ruling classes continue to block land reform, and this will continue to cause unrest until genuine reform takes place.

Reform of the political and electoral systems would also assist in giving the ordinary citizens of Rome more say in the nation's affairs. In particular, the unusual electoral system of the Roman Republic continues to ensure power remains in the hands of the few. The methods used to conduct elections are also deeply suspect.

Rome’s military activities continue to be of concern, especially in Transalpine Gaul. A Roman army under the consul Fabius Maximus this year defeated the Gallic tribes of the Allobroges and Arveni, and much of the region was destroyed during the campaign. The Romans appear to make little effort to conduct war without harm to civilians, and as a result thousands have been either murdered or reduced to slavery.

Rome's ongoing occupation of Hispania also displays characteristic brutality. There has been less unrest in this region since the end of the Numantine War, but the legacy of that brutal war is still being felt by the inhabitants of the province, with poverty and hardship being the lot of most inhabitants.

These minor incidents show that Rome continues to lead the way in advancing the cause of human rights in the region.

Friday, May 28, 2010

It Was A Stupid Investment

It was obvious to anyone with half a brain at the time that Allied Farmers' purchase of the toxic Hanover loan book was a particularly dumb investment.

(I just wish I'd blogged about it at the time - so I could show actual evidence I thought it was a stupid decision. That would have satisfied my need to feel superior. But you'll just have to believe me) 

And yet the board of Allied Farmers thought it was a good deal, and numerous advisers and analysts backed the move.

Today we learned that the loan book is in an even worse shape than first thought. This caused the share price of the company to plunge further.

The loan book was acquired last year for $396.2 million. It has today been valued at $124 million. And further losses are expected.

If I had owned shares in Allied I'd have bailed as soon as the word "Hanover" got mentioned. Those Hanover investors who agreed to take shares in Allied must be wondering why they bothered. They might have been better off just walking away and dismissing their entire Hanover experience as a bad dream.

We do have some truly inept people running many of our listed companies.

Andy Haden - Legend (?)

27 April 2010 - Five hundred days from the start of the Rugby World Cup 2011, six New Zealand rugby legends have agreed to help promote the event.

The announcement was made at an event at Parliament today hosted by Rugby World Cup Ministers Murray McCully and Gerry Brownlee.

The six former All Blacks appointed as New Zealand 2011 Ambassadors are Jonah Lomu, Sean Fitzpatrick, John Kirwan, David Kirk, Andy Haden, and Andrew Mehrtens.

“We are thrilled by the support we have received from these six legends of the game,” said Mr McCully.

“I especially want to thank Andy Haden. Haden is a true champion, a towering colossus whose contribution to rugby, both on and off the field, have been phenomenal.

“I can safely say that no other appointment I have ever made has given me more pleasure than this. Haden’s integrity, decency and wisdom are an example to all, so it is a thrill to announce his involvement as a rugby ambassador.

“In fact, it is fair to say that Haden’s genius and greatness shine like a beacon when all about is dark. His achievements are so magnificent and many that, no matter what may happen in the future, I will always be able to say ‘here is a man of integrity and decency, whose moral code no person could ever question or doubt’.

“And let me be clear that nothing, absolutely nothing, will move me from my view that Haden’s commitment to diversity, tolerance and understanding in the multicultural world we live in makes him an obvious choice to be an ambassador for the Rugby World Cup. Is there anyone you would rather have welcoming foreign players and fans to our land, especially from our neighbours in the Pacific Islands?

“Haden has been an inspiration to me, and has been instrumental in shaping me as a politician. His understanding of Polynesian people and the importance of their culture and religion was a shining light for me when I was shaping the details of my Pacific islands development plans.”

“So to you, Andy Haden, I say ‘keep up the fine work’.

“And to the other five ambassadors – thanks, I guess.”

Would You Buy A Property From This Man?

So what's in a name?
Bob Bangerter considers the Blue Chip "saga" over and is now working as a property consultant under the name Bob James.

The co-founder of the collapsed finance company told the Herald he was using his middle name because his surname was "difficult to spell".
And not because someone could Google his name and find out his history?

Mr Bangerter, 74, who is living in South Auckland, said he worked as a property consultant.

"I'm a consultant, and I sell property for a builder but I'm not in real estate as such. I sometimes - to make it easier for some people - call myself Bob James."

He said his work was nothing to do with Blue Chip.

"As far as I am concerned the Blue Chip saga is over. I have been cleared by everybody - the Companies Office, the Serious Fraud Office. I was not a director of Blue Chip or had access to any of the bank accounts. I'm 74, I'm trying to lead a normal life."
He was, however, a director of at least one Blue Chip company when it went into liquidation in 2008 - Blue Chip Auckland Limited. Maybe he's become forgetful. I imagine with all the bankruptcies, business failures and liquidations, one could get a big vague on details.

Bangerter's been bankrupted twice (most recently by Bob Jones in 2009, over a personal guarantee he gave in relation to Blue Chip), and was heavily involved with Blue Chip right up until its failure. He was a founder of Blue Chip and, even if he has avoided criminal liability, must still bear much of the blame for the way the company fleeced elderly investors.

So it's easy to understand why Mr Bangerter doesn't want to use his real name.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Leave The Red Cross Alone

There appears to be some outrage over news that the Red Cross have been helping Taliban wounded, and even training the Taliban in first aid.

I'm not feeling the hate. The Red Cross is a humanitarian organisation, and it doesn't take sides. It exists to provide medical help and relief to people. Nothing it is doing with the Taliban is inconsistent with those aims.

The benefits to having a non-partisan Red Cross were clearly evident during World War Two. Red Cross parcels helped to keep many prisoners of war alive. Had the Red Cross taken sides and simply denounced the Nazis as evil, many Allied prisoners would have died. Only a couple of days ago the Herald reported a story about former POW Jack Kelly. He suffered hunger and privation as a POW, but Red Cross parcels kept him alive.
Mr Kelly said he would probably not have survived but for the Red Cross parcels which came every fortnight, provided the Allies did not drop too many bombs and disrupt delivery and provided the German soldiers did not steal them.
So let's leave the Red Cross alone. We may not always approve of or like the people they are helping, but if the Red Cross starts taking sides it will become less effective in its global mission. If a few Taliban fighters' lives are saved as the price for that it's probably a fair price.

Still Not A Story

The Herald reports on further allegations about John Key’s business interests. These allegations are not so much swirling around him as spluttering, and I am struggling to see in them much more than a desperate attempt by the media and Opposition to connect dots.

Labour MP and dirty-deeds go-to man Peter Hodgson was on Morning Report today throwing muck about in the hope that some of it might stick to Key. His allegations revolve around the fact that Key sold his shares in three companies to a company called Whitechapel Limited at the same time that he was setting the blind trust up. Whitechapel was established and is legally owned by partners of an Auckland law firm, and still holds the shares in those three companies.

A quick check at the Companies Office shows that Whitechapel still owns those shares. Because this information is online and accessible to anyone who wants to look, Hodgson is trying to suggest that Key must in fact know he still owns these shares, and so is exposing himself to potential conflicts.

The obvious flaw in that argument is that Key doesn’t (at least legally) own the shares in Whitechapel Limited. The ultimate beneficial ownership of those shares may well have passed to someone else altogether. True, it’s unlikely, but it can’t be said with certainty that Key still has a beneficial interest in the three companies.

Nor has any evidence been produced to show that ownership of these companies would have put Key in a conflict of interest position, or that he has broken the rules. I don’t know how detailed Parliamentary and Cabinet rules are around conflicts and blind trusts, but if he has transgressed in any way it may well be minor.

And that’s the point. Even if Key has transgressed, it’s hardly a matter of national significance. I suspect it warrants no more attention than would a speeding fine or a parking ticket. In the same way I could not get excited over Phil Heatley’s extravagance in putting a bottle of wine on his ministerial credit card. Sure it wasn’t allowed, but it was a minor infraction. We all break the rules every day. When we speed, park over yellow lines (“It’s okay, because I just need to nip in and buy some milk”, you assure yourself), or take time off our busy work day to stare at blogs (even though our employer’s policy probably says the Internet’s for work purposes only), we’re breaking the rules. But because we’re not a nation obsessed with rule-following and obeying authority (or are we?), nobody bothers too much about it. So why we should hold politicians to a much higher standard of behaviour is beyond me.

If something truly dirty comes out about what Key’s been doing then I’ll reassess my views on this. But from what I’ve read it’s just a beat-up. And it does Labour no credit to pursue the matter in the absence of any real scandal.

If Labour want to be seen as a credible and viable alternative to National they should stick to debating policy, and cut the slurs and innuendo.

Whales Need Tough Love

The imminent trial in Japan of anti-whaling activist Peter Bethune is an opportunity to see justice done, says the group’s spokesman, Ahab McReverend.

"Since the abolition of unrestricted commercial whaling some years ago, we have been witness to a steady increase in the amount of whale rage. Do-gooders like Bethune think they are somehow helping the whales when they interfere in whaling operations, but they are in fact helping nobody."

Mr McReverend points out that recent Japanese scientific evidence shows that whales actually like being killed and eaten.

A study by the Japanese Cetacean Research and Sushi Foundation interviewed over a thousand whales as they were being caught and harpooned. The whales were asked a series of questions. Because whales do not have a language humans can understand, they were instructed to signal simple “yes” or “no” answers. A “yes” would be signalled by the whale thrashing around, while a “no” would be signalled by stillness.

When these whales were asked if they enjoyed being harpooned, all of them said “yes”.

When asked if the thought of their flesh becoming a wholesome meal for Japanese consumers gave them a sense of purpose and contentment, they were again unequivocal: 100% said “yes”.

And when asked whether Peter Bethune was an infamous criminal who should be shown no mercy, and who should be publicly humiliated in front of a braying Japanese public, all of them said “yes”.

Japan has long led the way in scientific research on whaling, and these scientific results cannot be easily dismissed. We know whales are a major social problem, but the research tells us that they want to be helped.

Well meaning liberals may think that their interventions can help, but the whales are telling us that what they want the most is tough love. Not social workers, case managers or other hand-wringers.

That’s why it’s important for the people of Japan to send a tough message to the world. They have done the science, and they know that their whaling programme helps to break whales from the grim cycle of swimming about, eating and mating. The results they have achieved are incredible, but no amount of science will ever convince the Peter Bethunes of the world.

The Sensible Whaling Trust urges the authorities in Japan to send a loud message to whale-lovers that their actions will be ruthlessly punished.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Another Beat Up?

I don't care that John Key owns a bunch of stuff. Tonight we learned on TV3 that he had shares in a vineyard.

It wasn't immediately apparent to me what the newsworthiness of this was. I can understand why some people might like to condemn him for actually owning stuff and being a "rich prick", but there seemed to be no story. The term "conflict of interest" kept getting mentioned, but no conflict was alleged.

Key says his assets are held in a blind trust and that he doesn't know what he owns. Blind trusts exist to avoid conflict of interest issues.

Key did look like a bit of a plonker, though, when he was shown telling someone over dinner that he owned a vineyard - a vineyard he supposedly held in a blind trust, and that he ought not to have known about.

On the other hand, the explanation given by David Farrar is plausible. Farrar claims Key made the dinner comments about owning the vineyard only three weeks after setting the blind trust up. If that is the case it would have been reasonable for Key to expect to have still owned the vineyard shares at that point.

So there doesn't appear, on the face of it, to be much of a story. Unless, of course, it turns out that Key knew about owning the vineyard months or years after he set the trust up.

But this beat-up story should not surprise us. The media seem preoccupied with trying to find scandal and personal misconduct in the behaviour of our politicians. That's because the really important stuff, like analysis of policy and its affects on people, is deeply unsexy. That's a pity, because I don't give a shit how many shares John Key owns, so long as he follows conflict of interest rules. But I do care deeply about the day to day decisions this Government makes, and the effects they have on people.

Screw You Wellington

Auckland has just been ranked the 4th best city in the world in terms of quality of living.

Wellington ranked a measly 12th. How pathetic is that? Losers.

Wellingtonians will probably crow about the fact that they’re the fifth-ranking Eco-City. Big fucking deal. And when you consider the amount of hot air emitted in Wellington by politicians and bureaucrats, it's pretty clear we could achieve carbon neutrality as a nation just by letting Wellington slide into the sea - which the accursed city will probably do when the next big one strikes anyway.

Soon we’ll have our Supercity, and then we’ll see a real shift in power northwards. Auckland’s where the heart of the nation resides – its economy, its purpose, its future.

God I hate you Wellingtonians so much.

[Update: It seems someone has been hacking into my blog account and saying awful and defamatory things about the good folk of Wellington. I offer my unreserved apologies for any offence that these comments may have caused. After all, it’s hardly the fault of the people who live in Wellington that their city is a dirty stain at the bottom end of the North Island, and that the sooner a giant reptile rises from the sea and stamps the entire city flat the better our lives will all be.]

[Update #2: I'm very sorry about that last bit. I apologise especially to any of my bosses in Wellington who might be reading this. If you're wondering whether to fire me, I think it might have been Richard L who posted those nasty comments. You should definitely fire him and not me.]

Garrett's Other Top Picks

ACT MP David Garrett says it is realistic to expect a 10-20% reduction in crime, following the passing of the three-strikes bill into law last night.

Here are ten other top predictions by Garrett:

  • Beatles to reunite for a world tour next month – with the original line-up.
  • Dan Brown to win the next Nobel Prize for Literature.
  • All Whites to win World Cup Final after a last minute goal against Brazil.
  • Pete Bethune to publish his new cookbook 50 Ten Minute Whale Recipes.
  • Lost fans able to explain show to non-followers in less than one hour.
  • Morrinsville used-car salesman is the real Jesus.
  • Green MP Sue Kedgley to ask if she can upsize her Mac Attack Combo Meal.
  • NZ to close the income gap with Australia by 2025.
  • Damien Hirst to admit modern art is all pretentious rubbish.
  • David Garrett to still be an MP after 2011 election.

But Is It Art?

Opinion is divided on the latest work by the controversial collective known as ACT.

The work, entitled “Sentencing and Parole Reform Act”, but better known as the “The Strikes Law”, was unveiled last night in Wellington.

The concept was the brainchild of David Garrett, the noted artist and ACT Party MP. Garrett was responsible for the bulk of the work, though other members of the collective assisted.

“I wanted something that expressed my feelings about man’s interaction with the instruments of oppression,” said Mr Garrett.

“I have always believed that proper art, real art, should be about self-examination. For me the law represents the final descent of mankind into irredeemable folly, and in that respect it tells us something powerful about the nature of the human soul and how the instruments of state violence are ever-present in our lives.”

Fellow artist and Corrections Minister Judith Collins has applauded the work.

“Garrett yet again displays his complete command of the genre. This piece exhibits his characteristic three-layered method in its most daring manifestation yet. Garrett devastatingly captures the commoditisation of our prison population, and in doing so makes a bold statement about the subversion of our justice system.”

But critics have been dismissive of the artwork.

Labour leader Phil Goff, also a prominent conceptual artist, called the law an artistic failure.

“The so-called artist known as Garrett has made a career of assembling weak pieces. This is no different. The triple-layered effect shows major technical weaknesses. This is a man who is not on top of his game.”

Other critics have labelled the work as “pretentious”, “vulgar” and “dated”.

Art historian and co-leader of the Maori Party, Tariana Turia, said Garrett’s work was the latest in a long line of similar works by overseas artists.

“There’s no originality on display. It is one thing to take an influence and play around with it to create something new, but Garrett’s work merely bundles together a lot of themes from American artists and patches them together. It’s hardly art. In fact it’s no better than much of the crass American trash he borrowed so heavily from.”

Law Society president Jonathan Temm said the work was deeply flawed.

“If Garrett’s intention was to subvert the justice system, then he has failed. How ironic that a supposedly subversive piece rebounds so heavily upon the artist, revealing his own moral decay and decadence. Garrett’s cognitive vulnerabilities are there for all to see in this work.”

But members of the collective have been quick to defend Mr Garrett and his artistic vision.

“David is a visionary,” said ACT Leader Rodney Hide. “His style is unique, and his technical skill in layering the three strikes is frankly unrivalled. This is a historic day for art in New Zealand.”

Mr Garrett plans to take the work on tour around various courthouses.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

What A Lot Of Arse

So the three-strikes bill is now law.

What a pile of arse. Labour opposed the bill, but I've yet to hear them say they'll repeal this lousy bit of law once they're back in power.

When do we get to have a proper Opposition?

******

Talking of proper Oppositions, my God, did Phil Goff get his arse handed to him on a plate today or what?

You expect Labour to dominate most Parliamentary debates, because they have some wily old campaigners, while many on the National front benches are quite clueless.

But today John Key put Goff in his place. I'm not a fan of this Government, but I can still appreciate a good arse-kicking (you can hear the audio here).

******

That's four uses of "arse" in one post, so I appear to have used up my quota for the month. That could become a problem, as there are still a number of days left before May becomes June, and you never know when you may need an arse. But I have a potential solution. Maybe we could set up an arse trading scheme, a bit like the ETS, so that if I need more "arse" and you have "arse" credits, I can acquire them from you.

But let me be clear that I'm not offering to pay money for a bit of arse. Not that I'm homophobic. I'm sure arses are perfectly fine if you're into that sort of thing. Oh my God, I'm digging a deeper and deeper hole for myself, and yet can't stop typing.

I knew I should have just gone to bed early.

Ask Rodney

Dear Rodney

I’ve been in a relationship for the last four years. My partner says he wants to spend the rest of his life with me, but every time I drop a hint about marriage he changes the subject. When I ask him about children he says he wants them, but just not yet. My friends say he needs to make a decision whether he’s serious or not, and that I should tell him its kids and marriage or he’s out the door. What should I do?

Barbara
Dear Barbara

You have a choice to make. But the choice is yours, not that of some bureaucrat in Wellington. We need to reduce the size of our bloated state sector and put the power back into the hands of consumers and taxpayers, so they can make decisions about what is best for them and their families. We know that Government agencies are inefficient and lack financial discipline. That’s why the ACT Party supports a smaller state sector and privatisation of state assets.

Rodney
Dear Rodney

For about three months I’ve been struggling with breathlessness and nausea whenever I leave the house. I have been to the GP many times, and last month he referred me to a specialist. None of them can find anything wrong with me. I’ve also been having difficulty sleeping, and often wake up suddenly with a start. This is beginning to affect my relationship, and my productivity at work has been steadily declining. Can you help diagnose the problem?

Jack
Dear Jack

The problem is the lack of incentives we provide to those on welfare to get off the benefit. We spend billions of dollars every year subsidising people in our society who contribute nothing. This simply cannot continue, unless we want to become another Greece or Iceland. The ACT Party is committed to welfare reform, and that’s why one of our policies is to get to the root of welfare dependency and address the key causes of it. We know that bad parenting is responsible for many children growing up with a lack of self esteem or confidence, and this sense of alienation leads to welfare dependency, as well as crime. Addressing these issues is one of this country’s most urgent priorities.

Rodney
Dear Rodney

I recently inherited a tidy sum of money and would now like to invest it. The recent finance company problems have left me feeling wary about putting money into the markets. My financial adviser says my best bet is to invest in managed funds, and he has given me a range of options. Do you think a managed fund is the best bet for me? Or am I better putting the money into real estate? I’m in my fifties, recently widowed, and have no dependants.

Sue
Dear Sue 
You sure have some nerve writing to me. As I’ve said before, your arguments simply don’t stack up. All the empirical evidence points to the fact that the Earth is cooling, not warming. Your attempts to baffle and confuse with these screeds of so-called scientific data merely show you to be at best misguided and, at worst, intellectually dishonest. Your supposedly peer-reviewed study is nothing more than a sham, a rubber stamp process engaged in with your climate change gravy-train chums. Recent events have shot to pieces any credibility your movement ever had.

You are little better than a used-car salesman, but the problem is that nobody wants to buy the used goods you’re pedalling. If you had any sense of decency you would apologise for misleading the world for years. But, then, I suspect you think it’s all a game, and the prize is the millions of dollars in funding you get every year, so why would you apologise? You have no regard for the fear you instill in people, and the enormous damage you and your movement have inflicted on our nation’s businesses.

The entire ETS process has been a fiasco and an unnecessary burden on companies, and we are now the laughing stock of the Western World. No other country is pushing ahead with an emissions trading scheme like ours. Even Australia has abandoned attempts to pass emissions trading legislation. All this has arisen because of you and your movement, and the poisonous lies you have spread. You people sicken me.
Rodney
Dear Rodney

Can you please explain to me the ACT Party’s position on the Resource Management Act?

Simon

Dear Simon

Lucky Lady is racing in the 3.10 at Te Rapa this Saturday. Put all your money on her. I have a good feeling about this one.

Rodney
Do you have any questions for Rodney? Now's your chance! Leave a question in the comments section.

Anti-Immunisation Doctor Discredited

A British doctor whose study linked autism to vaccinations has been barred from practising medicine.

The anti-immunisation lobby is about as anti-science as they come. No amount of science will convince them that their arguments are without substance. In that respect they are little different to climate change deniers. Or religious fanatics.

Worse, their ignorance has unquestionably led to an increase in rates of measles and other preventable diseases. These diseases can kill, or leave people permanently harmed.

Dr Andrew Wakefield is considered a hero by many in this anti-science movement. But he has now been barred from practising medicine after being found to have acted unethically in conducting his study.
His study in the medical journal Lancet was widely discredited, however, after Britain's medical regulator found it did not meet ethical standards; other studies found no link; and a British journalist revealed Wakefield had been paid by lawyers of parents who suspected their children were harmed by the vaccine.
He's appealing the decision, and he has the support of some in Hollywood.
Wakefield has garnered much support from parents suspicious of vaccines, including some Hollywood celebrities. In February, US actress Jenny McCarthy, who has an autistic son, issued a statement with her former partner Jim Carrey.

"It is our most sincere belief that Dr Wakefield and parents of children with autism around the world are being subjected to a remarkable media campaign engineered by vaccine manufacturers," McCarthy and Carrey said in February. "Dr Wakefield is being vilified through a well-orchestrated smear campaign."
Hollywood is also the spiritual home of Scientology, so the endorsement of Wakefield by celebrities does not necessarily help his case.

No other peer-reviewed study has found a link between autism and vaccinations. Only the discredited one conducted by Wakefield. And that report was formally retracted by the Lancet earlier this year.

But like all wingnut movements, the anti-immunisation lobby will now claim this is part of a giant cover-up by the medical profession, backed by the evil drug companies.

Because the truth is too painful to admit.

Monday, May 24, 2010

Some Honesty Would Be Nice

From the Herald:
A Budget that delivers thousands a week in tax cuts to the super wealthy and a few dollars to those on the minimum wage will leave the gap between rich and poor "about the same", Finance Minister Bill English said yesterday.
I'm sure English doesn't actually believe half the stuff that comes out of his mouth. There must be a time during every politician's career when he/she ceases to have any belief in anything they say. It looks like English is already there.

How can he possibly claim that the difference between rich and poor will be "about the same", when he's just given a whopping great tax cut to those who earn more? Surely they will be the ones better off. If not, then he's a lousy economist.
Speaking on TVNZ's Q+A , Mr English said that overall, the Budget would have no significant impact on the rich-poor gap.

"We've achieved a shift in our tax system without making that problem significantly worse in a static sense."
Did anyone check to see if his trousers were on fire when he said this?

I'd respect English more if he just came out and said "look, this Budget does widen the gap, but that's just tough shit, because the rich deserve more." At least he would be honest.

I Promose To Only Use My Powers For Good - Sometimes

This sounds dead good.
Scientists have succeeded in creating artificial life in a test tube, in a development which promises to revolutionise biotechnology.
Some good news. My dream of one day owning a cyborg army just got a little more real.

I'm sure the process was extremely complicated.
The research team, led by Craig Venter, who previously directed one of the teams which decoded the human genome, said it had created synthetic life in the form of a new species of bacteria that operates entirely under the control of a man-made set of genetic instructions, originally stored on a computer. They synthesised the genome of a bacterial cell and used it to "boot up" the empty cell of another species of bacteria, which then replicated freely as if it were carrying its own set of genetic instructions instead of a set made in a laboratory.
Yawn. Yep, complicated. Not to self: to create cyborg army, will need to kidnap key scientists. I can't be arsed replicating their work.
Some ethicists, however, expressed concerns. "Venter is not merely copying life artificially - he is going towards the role of a god - creating artificial life that could never have existed naturally," said Professor Julian Savulescu, an ethicist at the University of Oxford.
Hmmm... Sounds like someone's green with envy and wants to be a god too.
Professor John Harris, an expert on biomedical ethics at Manchester University, said: "This is heady stuff which Venter admits has powerful potential for both good and ill. While Venter is very precise about the possible benefits he is not specific about the dangers. This work deserves enthusiasm, but only so long as the risks are given attention commensurate with the benefits."
What dangers? My cyborg army will be models of discipline and self-control. They will only destroy life when I command it.

Right Thinking - The Hard Working Rich Deserve This Tax Cut

More good commonsense from conservative contributor Dr. Frank Shizenhausen

It was a pleasure last week to hear Bill English tell ordinary, decent, hardworking New Zealanders they would be allowed to keep more of what they earn.

People with both drive and innovative spirit are the future of this country. Their bravery in the face of uncertain financial times is responsible for the level of prosperity we now enjoy. They are the people who will benefit most from the tax cuts, and rightfully so. Their efforts in the finance company boardrooms and real estate investment seminars around our nation have put us where we are today. We all know what these folk deserve. Let us hope they now get it.

Well finally the Government has started to listen. The tax cuts are a start, though levels of state spending remain alarming. English has reduced the tax burden for those who most deserve a break, but Government profligacy in other areas, such as health and education, remains a concern.

All the same, we should be grateful that the tide is now turning. We have become accustomed to successive Ministers of Finance robbing us to pay for the upkeep of those in society who don’t contribute. They even have a name for this phenomenon: social justice. We all know, however, that social justice is just another label for socialism. History also tells us that whenever the insidious roots of socialism take hold in a country, the harvest is a bitter one. Freedom and liberty are always the victims.

Most decent people know this, and will welcome English’s Budget. They don’t need handouts – only the chance to rely on their own resources and efforts to get ahead. Sometimes life will throw obstacles in their path, but they are prepared to take things as they come. I was reminded of this only a few weeks ago, when I had my own misfortune. You don’t normally expect a policeman at your door first thing in the morning, and it’s even worse when they accuse you of exposing yourself to pre-school children. It was no use telling them it was all a terrible misunderstanding. The policeman wasn’t moved by my explanation that I had simply forgotten to wear trousers that day. There wouldn’t be a man alive who hasn’t forgotten to wear pants at some point, only to then accidently walk into a kindergarten.

The point of the story is that we all must endure the injustices life throws at us. Life isn’t fair. I am not going to bleat about how terrible my life is, or demand someone else clean up the mess fate has dumped on me, and I’m sure that so long as I have a good lawyer I’ll be fine. Unlike the last time I was before the court, when I was subject to a gross miscarriage of justice. I learned that day that if a nun attacks you, you have no rights. If you try stabbing her multiple times in self defence they’ll throw the book at you. Once upon a time you were a patriot if you stabbed a Papist. How times have changed.

This Budget is a step in the right direction, and will encourage self-sufficiency and personal responsibility. The Government’s next move must be to cut spending in health, welfare and education. All of those items are colossal wastes of money, but the socialists have conditioned people to feel a sense of entitlement towards them, so we will need to see some political bravery by this Government if things are to change.

Education is a good example of wasted spending. One of the biggest errors we as a society have committed since the nineteenth century is to attempt to educate everyone. Giving the poor access to education doesn’t make them any less stupid. If anything, learning only confuses their small minds and leads to them making terrible mistakes, like thinking they have a right to participate in how society is run. You only need to look back at early 20th century Russia to see where that kind of philosophy leads.

So let’s cut the education spend to zero. Those who want to educate their children will still be able to do so, but market forces will ensure the level of education available to an individual will be that best suited to their needs. Those who have the money will be able to send their children to good schools, where they can be free from the distracting odours of the poor. The poor will in turn be able to go out in the fields and teach their children which types of plants yield which fruit, and which bugs are good sources of nutrition – all for no cost. Those children will grow up to become useful members of society, able to dig holes and perform other menial tasks. And when we reach Peak Oil and can’t afford to drive cars any more, we will need plenty of these folk to pull our wagons and carry our sedan chairs. The biofuel potential of the poor is also worth exploring.

Talking of animals, if I had a racehorse and he went lame, I’d shoot him. So why do we publicly fund hip and knee operations? When my beloved pet dog was diagnosed with cancer I had the vet euthanise him. We could do away with most of the overpaid oncologists in our public hospitals if we followed that example. At the moment we spend billions on these doctors and specialists, when a mere handful of vets ought to be able to run any big public hospital. Anaesthesiologists are also an unnecessary burden on our public health system – if you can’t handle the pain then don’t get ill. A well-run private health system remains an essential item, however. This should be run on a totally user-pays basis, and careful vetting of who can take health insurance would ensure our premiums stayed low.

Health spending has gone crazy over the years in part because of the enormous burden imposed by the importation of expensive pharmaceuticals. Most of these are a waste of money, and you’d be better off taking a sugar pill in most cases. I speak from experience. You wouldn’t know it from reading this article, but I’m not as young as some of my progressive and modern ideas may make me seem. I’m in reasonable health, but sometimes the body needs a little something to keep it going. I’ve learned over the years that most of the stuff the doctors prescribe are a waste of time. So I go to this Asian fellow whose treatments always work, even if the product is a bit pricey. I usually go away from his place with a big bag of his special medicines, enough to keep me going for a month or so. In fact I'll be phoning him shortly to see if my latest batch has arrived. I called in on him last week, but he said the courier from Taiwan hadn’t yet arrived.

This hardworking Asian man has found the answer to my troubles. When I take his special medicine I start feeling better almost immediately. The point is that it works, unlike so much of the snake oil prescribed by doctors and specialists. If everyone had one of these medicine men in their neighbourhood we could do away with Pharmac.

Think of the good things we could do if we simply stopped wasting money on health, welfare and education. There might be some slight increase in police costs, and we would probably have to build large perimeter fences around our affluent neighbourhoods. After all, nothing is more certain than that the poor will want what we have. And they will want to take it from us, rather than earn it.

Even with some slight increases in spending, there should still be plenty of money left to build something truly splendid and lasting for the people of this country to enjoy. A monument to freedom, perhaps, like a Kiwiana version of the Statue of Liberty. Or, better still, a giant laser cannon.

Those plans are better discussed in another column. Right now I have to go see my Asian friend. I tried ringing, but there’s no answer, so I'll have to go around. Oh, but this talk of Government spending does make me feel unwell. Maybe I need some of his medicine before I get behind the wheel.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Four Bastards

Four new inductees into the Imperator Fish Hall of Shame

The Herald on Sunday reports:
A blonde model was having a relationship with disgraced Bridgecorp boss Rod Petricevic when he allegedly signed off more than $1 million in "dishonest" payments to her, according to investigators.

Janita Wright received $1.12m for claimed data entry, marketing and consultancy work from her former companion's finance company.

However, a Government investigation failed to find evidence of work Wright had invoiced for, and said the call centre she operated for Bridgecorp had little traffic.

"Any call centre activity would have been in the weekend only and only minimal, with an average of 5 calls per weekend," the Ministry of Economic Development (MED) report said.
So what was she being paid for?
Wright told the Dominion Post this week the money from Bridgecorp was fairly earned: "I worked my butt off for that company, seven days a week."
And I think we can all guess what she was paid to do.

Just another reason why the person who punched Rod Petricevic outside a restaurant a few months back ought to be inducted into the Order of New Zealand.

The sooner we find a reason to put the man in jail the better.

 ******

Meanwhile, it turns out that Mark Bryer's pledge to set up a scheme to compensate Blue Chip investors has about as much chance of paying out as a bet on the All Whites to win the World Cup.


Despite being bankrupt, he's got access to money and assets - the Herald reports the bastard drives a  late-model Peugeot, earns $144,000 a year and lives in a $2.5 million apartment. Which makes a mockery of his claim to be sorry for the losses his actions caused. Actions speak louder than words.

But he apparently owes $235 million to creditors, so there's no chance of a payout to investors.

If you lost money in Blue Chip, don't expect Mr Bryers to come knocking on your door with a cheque. In fact, if he does comes knocking, set the dogs on him.

******

Eric Watson is another who seems to enjoy living the high life on other peoples' money. His henchman Mark Hotchin has borne most of the flak from the Hanover fallout, but Watson is just as culpable. The only difference is that Hotchin's hubris has outshone Watson's.

But Watson's no stranger to business failure either. And yet another company he co-owns is now in trouble.

I can't stand Russell Crowe, because he's an overrated buffoon (Australia, he's all yours), but the finest thing he ever did was give Watson a smack.

******

All this means I have new four people to add to my Hall of Shame. I know, why so many? But I've not been taking care of business, so thought I ought to dump a whole pile of complete bastards in to catch up. These guys should all have been in months ago.

Friday, May 21, 2010

Fattening The Goose

Do you ever feel like a goose in a cage? Every day you're taken out of your cage, and someone then stuffs a pile of food down your throat, before sticking you back in your enclosure.

It's all very well being the goose that gets fatter and fatter, but we all know what happens to the goose in the end.

Is that what's about to happen to us? Bill English is gorging us on a diet of tax cuts. But you know we'll have to pay for it in the end. 

So what's the catch? Maybe the goose is about to be flogged off to foreign buyers, cage and all.
Finance Minister Bill English has signalled the Government is again considering partial state asset sales - including Kiwibank.

At a post-Budget lunch in Christchurch today, English told business leaders that National would "get to grips'' with its position on state asset sales in the next eight months.

He revealed the Government was conducting a stock-take of its assets and their worth and would produce an "investment statement'' next year. 
Kiwibank would make a tasty dish for an Australian bank looking to acquire a larger chunk of the New Zealand market. The Righties in charge of our lives don't like Kiwibank and never have. They live in a world where markets are perfect creatures, and where government bureaucrats are incompetent sloppy beasts unable to wipe their own arses without indulging in enormous wastage. So state ownership of anything in anathema.
A good example was Kiwibank, English said.

It had got to a size where it needed either a government guarantee or ''an awful lot of capital''. If there was any asset that was regarded as risky by credit ratings agencies it was a rapidly growing bank.
''So one option would be to go to the market and raise capital. So keep crown ownership, majority crown ownership and raise the rest of the capital from the market. So who'd buy into that.'' 
You know, there's actually a potentially good idea in there, but only if we can be sure the assets will stay in the hands of ordinary small investors. If we could sell say 40% of these SOEs but somehow do so in a way that maintained ownership in the hands of the country's citizens, that would certainly recapitalise them, encourage investment in the markets (as opposed to property, because who with a bit of cash wouldn't invest in a rock-solid SOE? I would), and allow them to grow. A win win.

The trouble is I simply don't trust National on this, and I don't see how we could ensure these assets didn't simply end up being flogged off bit by bit. Sell 40%, then sell another 10%, then a bit more, and a bit more. By that time someone in Australia is calling the shots, so why not flick the rest off?

But the public are feeling so bloated trying to digest their tax cuts they'll probably let it slip. I really have little hope for Labour in 2011, and I suspect National will make a move on state assets in its second term. Will the Public even notice? So long as Bill and co keep stuffing more down their throat, they'll probably just go along with it.

More On Budget 2010

I’ve not been able to keep on top of the saturation coverage of the Budget, but here are some initial observations/questions.
  • When Key and English tell us the tax changes are fiscally neutral, they are not telling the entire truth. But I’ll be charitable and not accuse them of pedalling outright lies. You see, we are going to have to borrow more to pay for these tax cuts. How should we feel about that? Key and English keep saying the overall effect is fiscal neutrality, but that only works out to be the case if their growth projections pan out. In the short term they’ll have to borrow. How reliable are those projections? I suspect about as reliable as the tip I got the other day to bet everything on Number 12 in the 3:30 at Ellerslie. So the best we can say is that the changes might be fiscally neutral. Still making sound economic sense?
  • Have any of the experts who’ve been telling us how the tax cuts will stimulate growth, got a real world example to point to where this has worked? An example of a tax cut regime in a country where it can’t be argued that growth occurred for other reasons?
  • Has anyone done a study in New Zealand on the correlation, if any, between economic growth and tax rates? I seem to remember we had quite solid growth for most of the last decade, under a government that raised taxes when it took office. If such a study does exist it would make for interesting reading. Why isn’t it being distributed widely?
  • Should basic financial and statistical literacy courses be obligatory for business journalists? For example, “median” and “average” are not the same thing. They are very different, and suggesting the majority are better off based on what people on the “median” income are getting is just nuts. Now I should add that I was lousy at maths at school and came as close as one can get to failing 7th form Statistics without actually doing so. But then I don’t make a living writing business news.
  • When you were calculating your tax cut and deciding how many Caribbean islands to acquire, did you factor in the effects of the ETS, ACC levy changes, possible rent increases, and cuts to childcare funding? Still better off?

Prepare To be Assimilated

Is there no area of technology that Google is not heavily involved in? The company has just announced plans to build a Google TV.

But it turns out that this might be the tip of the iceberg. Developers at Google have revealed some other exciting plans.
New Google motto – Their famous motto is being revised. The word “Don’t” is being removed, as this small word has been badly affecting their bottom line.

Google Jesus – It’s quite possible that Google are the messiah. In case you’re not convinced, the corporation will next year begin rolling out a new generation of religious prophets whose adherence to the great Google God will ensure millions of new followers. Not interested? You will be once you find out what happens to unbelievers.

Google Microsoft – No, not a merger. Think of it more as a snack. The monster is hungry and needs to feed.

Google Money – This may be their boldest move yet: an entirely new currency to rival and eventually replace the Euro and US dollar as global currencies. The new currency will be called the AYBABTU.

Google Army – It’s not enough to dominate the online and technology worlds. This new product really does allow the corporation to take charge of the market in a way no company has before. Think Blackwater but on a much much bigger scale.

Google Government – By the time all the other measures have come into effect you’ll have been softened up to such an extent that you’ll probably just go “meh”.

Google Earth – And you thought that was something else? Ha!
Resistance is futile!

Have You Given To The Party, Comrade?

This must be just what it is like living in a police state. At every street corner, almost at every doorway, someone stands watching you, making sure you don’t step out of line. Have you donated to the Party? Is that all? You can afford more than that. More! Then you move a few metres down, only to be harassed by more of them. So you wear your Party badge, hoping they’ll leave you alone. But they don’t.

Yes, it’s Westpac Rescue Helicopter Appeal Day. Collectors are everywhere, and I have been asked numerous times whether I can spare some cash. Embarrassingly, I had none on me, because I had already dumped what I had into the collection tin of the poor Mercy Hospice people who are also trying to raise funds today. They chose a bad day to take Them on.

I don’t mean to suggest the Westpac Rescue Helicopter is not a worthy cause. But there are many good causes, and I usually donate if I have cash. I just didn’t today.

But it makes you wonder how effective the banks might be if they threw off their customer service niceness and polish and just acted like ruthless totalitarian monsters. Because for one such bank its collection staff are already halfway there.

Mysterious Blogger Breaches Suppression Order! Who On Earth Could Have Done This?

It doesn't take a genius to work out the identity of the blogger behind this story.
An Auckland blogger has defied a court-ordered suppression by publishing the name of a senior civil servant facing a charge of assault. 
The man, who has pleaded not guilty to the charge, has had his name suppressed. His case is currently before the courts.  
The Dominion Post cannot name the blogger because doing so could draw attention to the naming of the man.

The blogger wrote there should be "concern that there is suppression in this case" because the man's name was reported in news media stories more than a year ago and a simple Google search revealed the stories.

"This has all the hallmarks of something being swept under the caret (sic) by the establishment. A cosy little arrangement to protect ... I fully expect I'll get slapped with another charge over this one."
The Dom Post is frightened of revealing the blogger's identity, even though everyone knows who he/she is. Describing him/her as an "Auckland blogger" and then quoting the blogger's words about being "slapped with another charge", are all the clues anyone needs to find the blogger's post.

Still, I'm not a media lawyer, and I'm sure the Dom Post knows what it's doing. So long as I don't go beyond what the Dom Post says, I should be okay.

By the way, if you want to comment, please don't name the blogger or link to the blogger's article. We all know who he/she is.

Send The Lot Of Them To Oz

So Mark Bryers only got a slap on the hand. I can understand the outrage, but the offences he was charged with were relatively minor ones. That doesn't mean Bryers is a saint. In fact the SFO are still looking into the collapse of Blue Chip, and there may be more pain to come for Bryers.  But the fact he received what seems like a light sentence probably isn't the fault of the court. Only one of the charges before the court was punishable by jail.

Still, Bryer's lawyer's argument against any form of community service was a brave one:
Bryers had wanted his offending dealt with by way of fine only. His lawyer, Aaron Lloyd, referred to a letter from Bryers' employer noting that the hassle of their employee having to return from his Sydney home to do community service in New Zealand might make it not worth employing him.
His employer is Northern Crest Ltd, previously named Blue Chip Financial Solutions, the sole remaining remnant of the Blue Chip group. It is now run by Australians with the assistance of Bryers, acting as a consultant.
It's most likely that Bryers is still in charge, or at least highly influential, behind the scenes of Northern Crest, so he's essentially employing himself. I think he can probably sort leave out with his boss.

His claim to own only the clothes on his back and a set of golf clubs is also looking shaky:
Bryers is paid up to $144,000 a year ($10,000 to $12,000 a month). That information is contained in a probation report examining Bryers' ability to pay a fine.
The only positive in this story is that he's living in Australia, not here. In fact, that's a compelling reason to be done with the community service and just ban him from returning here. Because I may have found a path to achieving one of our nation's economic goals.

If we deport all the finance and property company shysters, clowns and rogues to Australian (Bryers, Hotchin, Petricevic et al), and don't allow them to return, we'll have closed the income gap with Australia in no time.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Budget 2010 - How The Budget Affects You

I've done some number-crunching to work out what affect the tax cuts will have. Below is a helpful guide.
Ignore the other calculators. This is the only one that matters.

Budget 2010 - Live!

1:58pm: Bill English is looking fabulous in his trademark black suit, and the camera is adoring him.

2:01pm: English places the One Ring on his finger and begins speaking.

2:22pm:  English announces everyone will get a pony. Those on lower tax brackets will get dead ones.

2.34pm:  A big cheer from the House as English announces increases in health and education spending, and as froth begins to appear on Roger Douglas's mouth.

2:58pm:  Tax rules will be changed so that from 1 October the only rorting of the public permitted will be when politicians claim to live in one place but reside in another.

3:16pm:   English: “Tax depreciation rules will also change from 1 April next year, so that ASH NAZG DURBATULÛK, ASH NAZG GIMBATUL, ASH NAZG THRAKATULÛK, AGH BURZUM-ISHI KRIMPATUL!” A loud cheer from Murray McCully.

3:26pm:  Gerry Brownlee’s dinner allowance to be increased by 28%.

3:47pm: English says property depreciation rule changes are essential to discourage patent attorneys and IP lawyers from buying up all the volcanoes.

3:58pm:  The speech is over. A crowd of young children enter the chamber waving flags and singing. There are cries of “long live Comrade English!” from all corners of the debating chamber.

Kapa Haka Group Welcomes Maori Party Leadership...

(original story and picture from Stuff)

Any other suggestions for a caption? Keep it clean, though.

And It's... Eb Leary

It's hard to feel too much sympathy for lawyer Eb Leary, who has given up on his bid for continued name suppression.

Mr Leary was charged with money laundering in 2008, but that charge was thrown out. His wife, however, was convicted of money laundering after pleading guilty.

Leary has what could be called a "colourful" past. He was struck off in 1987 and was reinstated a few years ago after a lengthy battle with the Law Society. Many people (including Stephen Franks) think he should have never been reinstated.

Irrespective of the fact that the charges against Leary were thrown out, serious questions have to be raised about a process that allows people chucked out of the profession for serious wrongdoing to return. A good number of the people who vouched for Leary in 2007 must now be wondering about their decision.

Let's be clear: Leary's not been convicted of anything. But being a barrister and solicitor requires more than just not being convicted of a serious offence. Associations with people involved in crime got Leary struck off in 1987. This time it's someone very close to him.

Leary would have had to show he was truly reformed before being reinstated in 2007. It seems strange, then, that he is still associating with criminals. He will of course argue that he had no knowledge of the criminal activities of those associates - even if one of those associates was his wife.

But some of the facts of the case reported by the Herald make interesting reading:
Bugged conversations between Voerman and his partner, Patricia Barnett, who was a friend of Claudine Leary, revealed he was worried about being caught by police after the arrest of one of his dealers.
He had removed any drugs and money from their apartment and said he left a "shitload of money" at the Learys' Princes Wharf apartment, after visiting the couple the night before. 
He had left a blue bag there while having a couple of drinks.

In the conversation with his partner, Voerman said he needed to get back the money - which he referred to as around $160,000 - to "pay my bills".

He later rang Claudine Leary to ask: "Hey, have you still got some money at home?"

She replied, "No, nothing", and that her husband had "the lot".

When interviewed by the police, Mr Leary said he remembered Voerman visiting his apartment and leaving a bag behind, which he took to a safe in his office the next day for Voerman to pick up.

"It was so light I didn't think it had anything in it," he told the police in the statement.

Mr Speed later successfully argued that the Crown evidence against his client was inadmissible, and the charge was dismissed.
You can decide for yourself whether Leary is the type of person who ought to be practising law.

I'm sure most in the profession will have strong opinions on the matter.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Hotchin's Hurt Feelings Trump Hanover Investor Losses

Finally some common sense:
A broadcaster is defending Hanover co-founder Mark Hotchin, describing the businessman as a victim of tall-poppy syndrome.

On Newstalk ZB's breakfast show yesterday, host Mike Hosking said Mr Hotchin was being unfairly hounded by media.

He was not a criminal and had apologised for his company's failure.

"What's his crime? There isn't one ... he's not charged, he's not in court, he's not in jail," he said.
 
"What he did was make some bad decisions, borrow too much, gear too highly, and the company fell over."

Hanover, co-founded by Mr Hotchin and Eric Watson, left more than 16,000 investors out of pocket when it froze $554 million worth of assets.
Hosking is absolutely right. When you consider the losses Hanover's investors have suffered, they pale in comparison to Hotchin's troubles. How would you like it if your $4000 a night luxury getaway kept being interrupted by journalists?

People forget how sorry Hotchin feels about what happened. Some people say his $30 million palace on Paratai Drive is an obscenity, is in bad taste, and shows awful timing. They say that if he truly gave a damn about the people who lost their money due to mismanagement by Hanover's directors, he would have built something slightly less extravagant. Or canned the building project and given the money to the people who lost their retirement savings.

But then those people don't appreciate that Hotchin deserves this grandiose home. A man who has contributed so much to the incomes of lawyers, receivers, and forensic accountants around the country deserves some reward. And as John Key tells us, rich people are better than us, and their needs are greater.

Mike Hosking points out that Hotchin's actions were not illegal, therefore they cannot be morally wrong, because any harm done to investors has been rectified with a heartfelt apology. And you know Hotchin's sincere, because he's toned down his house plans. He had planned to install a huge fountain gushing Chateau Lafite Rothschild onto the lawn (apparently the plants love the stuff). Now he's had to scale back and use Penfold's Grange instead.

And what reason do you have to question your betters anyway? I mean, look at you. Frankly, you're a fairly shabby specimen of humanity, and I certainly wouldn't have you as a member of my golf club. If you think that's unkind, take a look at yourself. You're sitting alone at your computer, either hiding from your partner (assumng you've ever been in a relationship with another person - and online doesn't count), or trying to avoid work. You're nothing. People like Mark Hotchin provide inspiration for us. We can all dream of spending months on a Hawaiian beach, pondering the challenges of building a mansion in the finest part of Auckland, and wondering which leisure activity to indulge in next. But for most of us it will only ever be a dream. You in particular will never achieve any of these things (look at you!), so why not pretend to be someone else for a while?

That's why Hosking is right. We need the Mark Hotchins, the Eric Watsons, the Mark Bryers and Rod Petricevics of the world to give us something to dream about.

John's Diary - 19/5/10

The last week or so has been an ordeal. And I don't just mean having to listen to Gerry's latest plans to surgically mine precious minerals. Apparently up to 4% of the human body is made up of minerals. So Gerry reckons he's now found a way for people on welfare to contribute to society. Paula's suddenly warmer on the mining plan.

Those brown folk up in the hills are a grumpy lot. They say I lied to them. I can assure you I did no such thing. I told the Tuhoe negotiating team that the Crown would hand over the Urewera National Park, but I had my fingers crossed at the time, so it doesn't count. Anyway, as the leader of the Australian Opposition has just explained, things said in the heat of the moment, rather than in carefully considered press releases and articles, don't count.

Chris was not a happy man when I told him my plan. He said the media would eat me alive. Not if Tuhoe got there first, I joked. I thought it was pretty funny, so why did Chris just put on his frowny face?

I reckon this will silence those people who voted for me but who've been complaining I've given too much to the Marries. On the other hand, I suspect the beads and blankets my ancestors gave Maori are of more value than the supposed concessions I've given the Maori Party. Pita and Tariana are hopping mad, but they'll get over it. They seem to enjoy the rough stuff, and will be back for more.

Anyway, it will soon be forgotten on Thursday. I'm putting the finishing touches on the Budget. There's something in it for everyone, so long as you earn over $70K and don't smoke.

As I said the other day, the tax cuts to be announced in the Budget are critical to the welfare of our most precious citizens - the rich. I sometimes wonder why we put up with all the abuse and the insults from those envious poor folk. After all, we contribute the most in taxes (LOL!) and work harder than anyone else (ROFL!). Sometimes I wonder if I shouldn't just get away from it all and go live on a tropical island somewhere. Wait a minute, I already do for half the year! LOL!

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Doing The Left Thing - Introducing Bob Mittsky

The introduction of Dr. Frank Shizenhausen as a columnist at Imperator Fish has been such a success that my inbox has been full. Most of the emails I receive are from pharmaceutical companies wanting me to acquire their various wares (isn’t it funny how they know about my little problem?), but it can’t be a coincidence that I introduce a doctor to this blog and suddenly people are trying to sell me drugs.

Occasionally I am told by one of the many voices in my head that I should not allow this blogsite to air any of Frank’s opinions. I appreciate that someone as hard-hitting as Frank is bound to get under the skin of people, because his articles are well-researched and expose some unpleasant truths about us as a society. Nevertheless, I don’t want a perception to exist that this blogsite allows only those from the Right to contribute. Imperator Fish is a broad church.

So I decided to hunt down an alternative voice for the Left. I had a lot of offers, but went with Bob Mittsky. I’m sure you’ve read Bob’s work before, but in case you haven’t, here’s a brief bio.

Bob was born in Liverpool into a working class family, and moved to New Zealand when he was in his twenties. His class consciousness and passion for the underdog was born during his time working on the Liverpool docks. He is active in the union movement in New Zealand, and currently sits on the Executive Committee of the Maritime and Cheese Transportation Union. He joined the Workers Solidarity Party of Aotearoa in 2001, and rose to become its Chairman in 2005. Last year Bob travelled to North Korea to be honoured with the Korean Star, an award given to the most outstanding advocates for class struggle. He has sold dozens of books, and is a regular contributor to online forums and radio talkback shows.

Here is Bob’s first column.

According to our Prime Minister, we should be grateful that the rich are about to get a tax cut. These fat cats are never satisfied with the loot stolen by them from the workers of this land, and so Key will give them yet more.

History will judge Key harshly over the coming Budget, you can be sure. One day, soon perhaps, the current cabal of capitalists, bankers and fascists will be swept from power by the workers of this country. Don’t be surprised if more than a little blood is shed. They’ve been bleeding us for years, so they ought to be ready to lose some of their own. The verdict of history will record the infamous evil of Key’s fascist regime.

The problem with history is that, in most cases, it is written by the elites. Take the story of Joseph Stalin as an example. His grandson recently tried to preserve Stalin’s magnificent legacy by taking a radio station to court. The station had been broadcasting lies about Stalin’s benevolent regime, so his grandson, Yevgeny Dzhugashvili, took a libel action against the station. It failed, in part because the Russian court was stacked full of puppets of the ruling elites.

Dzhugashvili’s other hurdle was to overcome the fact that the lies spread about Stalin have become all too commonplace and are now part of the common narrative. Some deluded souls have said Stalin was a genocidal monster, and that under his rule millions of Russians died. I’ve even heard people claim that during the 1930s he implemented a policy of deliberately starving to death millions of Ukrainians. Can you believe such stuff? You shouldn’t. Joe Stalin was a kindly avuncular character who loved children and whose people loved him. It is true that unfortunate errors may have been made by others during his rule. The real history books (in other words, those written by Stalin’s people, who had first-hand knowledge of events) tell us that when famine struck the Ukraine in the 1930s and drove people from the land, Stalin went out of his way to find people alternative accommodation. Millions were offered places in Siberian holiday camps, where they could relax and take a break from their daily toils.

The terrible thing about the allegations made about Stalin over the years is that often the people making them claim to be from the Left. But some who claim to represent the workers are little more than the hired tools of the bosses. Those class traitors have turned their backs on the struggle, preferring to instead peddle a flawed version of history sponsored by the capitalists. The truth of the matter is that the honourable work done by Stalin to bring power and equality to the poor, and to crush the wealthy classes, was astonishingly successful. For so long as Stalin ruled nobody in Russia could claim to have any kind of fortune.

And let us not forget that Stalin’s magnificent war leadership against the Fascists inspired a nation. The fact that he purged almost all of the Red Army’s leaders in the years leading up to the war, interfered in critical decisions during the important opening phases of the war by refusing to allow armies caught up in hopeless positions to withdraw (thus ensuring the needless annihilation or surrender of hundreds of thousands of soldiers), and refused to take seriously the obvious fact that Germany was planning to attack, are mere technical minutiae that need not bother or interest the non-historians amongst us.

Some people tell me that the only thing these class enemies and splitters deserve is a bullet. They ask me why I don’t speak up and openly advocate death for these traitors. There’s no question they deserve everything they get, but that’s not for me to determine. If others want to listen to my words and take from them a message that it is okay to round up and destroy those in our society who oppose our views, then it’s hardly my fault. I can’t control what people will do. I’m just a columnist.

And if I take a great deal of pleasure in the suffering of those traitors, that doesn’t mean I instigated it. I hope that you take this into account if you are thinking about taking direct action. I encourage any sort of action that will free our enslaved brethren, but nothing that can be pinned on me. Not because I fear retribution, but because with the position I hold in the Workers Solidarity Party of Aotearoa I have a duty to keep my nose clean. You see, if the Fascists think I am somehow involved they may target me, and then the Party would be leaderless.

You know, the leadership of the Party is a real burden. I’d much rather be on the barricades railing against the Fascists, but someone needs to stay behind and organise. The Blackberry, the Lexus, and the penthouse apartment are also necessary evils. What better way to show the utter failings of capitalism than to use the tools of the bosses against them?

That’s why, brothers, when you’re engaged in nameless and unspecified actions against class enemies, I’ll be sitting at home watching my large high definition wide-screen TV, snorting cocaine from the bellies of strippers, and drinking the finest Chablis. Because that’s just what the capitalists would do. If we are to defeat our enemies we must first understand their ways. But, though I make this sacrifice, possibly the biggest sacrifice of all within the Movement, rest assured that your small effort in eliminating “problems” is important to me.

So go forth, comrades, and do what you must, although let me be very clear that I’m not telling you what you must do, or who you should do it to.

Monday, May 17, 2010

World's Greatest Blogger Finishes John Key

I am the world's greatest blogger. I don't mean to boast, but it's a fact. And when you're on top of the heap you don't waste time with the small-fry. That's why in my latest post I've decided to destroy John Key and his reputation. This could possibly be the most important thing you will read until my next post.

John Key was in the Sunday Star Times yesterday answering questions from various celebrities and readers.

It is typical of the man who now leads our country that we failed to get more than a glimpse of the real John Key. The responses were carefully scripted, and allowed Key to deal with some tough questions by way of platitudes and generalisations.

So I decided to get to work, and I secured my own interview with the man. You can imagine how excited he would have been to learn that I, the world's greatest blogger, wanted an audience with him. During the course of that powerful interview I learned some things about our Prime Minister that disturbed me. I asked some of the most hard-hitting questions the man had ever heard, and the ugly truth came pouring out like the crap from a leaky septic tank.

My first question was like a flame torch applied to his nether regions. My aim was to throw Key off balance right from the start, and to then start tearing into him until the man was a carcass. It worked, and we soon began to see the real John Key - in all its falseness and deviousness.
Imperator Fish:  Is it fun being the PM?
John Key:  Mostly, although the hours are long.
The "mostly" was telling. Surely if the man in charge of our country can't summon up enough enthusiasm to enjoy his job all of the time, then he's not fit to be in command. Here was the first sign that I was dealing with a mediocrity whose only desire was to cling to power, though he had nothing to offer the nation.
IF:  So just how awful are Labour?

JK:  I prefer not to use the term "awful". That's for others to judge. But I certainly don't think they have the right policies for this country.
A simple question, you would have thought, but Slippery John managed to deflect in his usual way by insisting it was someone else's job to answer the question. I was seeing clear evidence of a lack of accountability.
IF:  What is your favourite colour?

JK:  That would have to be blue, of course.
Key may aspire to be a tyrant, but a weak one is all he will ever be. Blue is a soft colour, beloved by timid folk. Everyone knows that red is the traditional colour of strength.
IF: Just how awesome are you?

JK:  Well... I'm not sure I'd say that. I have my faults, just like anyone else. But I always do my best.
Only a few questions into the interview, and he was already badly contradicting himself. He had already shown he lacked the passion for the job. So how could he then claim to be doing his best all of the time? I had exposed him as a liar and a fraud.
IF:  Are you the greatest Prime Minister we have ever had?

JK:  Good grief, I mean... I've only been in the job 18 months. A lot of very fine people have been before me.
He could have just said "no", but then he would have had to explain later why he built the hundred foot golden statue of himself on the site of the Tank Farm. You think he won't? If so, you're deluding yourself.
IF:  Do you like animals?

JK:  Oh yes. Especially dogs. We have a few pets at home, but I've always liked dogs.
So Key admitted to having animal favourites. Most people would avoid any admission of bias when dealing with animal issues, but Key happily admitted to a dog preference. One might wonder how he can sit in Cabinet and listen to animal welfare issues being discussed, without favouring one species over another. Has he declared a conflict of interest on this matter? Of course not. This is an astonishing lapse in ethical standards.
IF:  How do you deal with criticism from the tired, irrelevant Labour Party, whose past failings are so colossal that it beggars belief anyone would ever vote for them, let alone join their ranks?

JK:  Are you sure David Farrar didn't send you?
That was a telling admission that Key is used to being visited by David Farrar, the evil mastermind behind Kiwiblog, and who is due to appear as the villain in the next Bond film. Are darker powers leaning on Key? What is their agenda?
IF:  What is the secret behind your genius?

JK:  I'm no genius. I work hard, but I have a great team working with me.
Here he admitted to being a fool.  A fool who relies on others to pull his arse out of the fire. Damning.
IF:  When did you discover you were just like Jesus?

JK:  Is this a wind-up? Am I being filmed? I've never thought I was like Jesus. What an outrageous thing to say!
See how tetchy he got when I revealed his Messiah complex to the world?
IF:  Are you the world's greatest lover?

JK:  I'm a married man, in a committed relationship, and I'm not about to share any bedroom secrets with someone I don't even know. Just who exactly are you? These questions are getting weirder by the minute.
So the PM admitted he had secrets to hide: dark dirty shameful ones. When you rule a democratic country you must be open and transparent. What is Key hiding? Would you trust him?
IF: Can I touch you?

JK: Ah... I'd rather you didn't. My security people get nervous about such things.
Thus he sets himself up like a king, so that none may touch his holy person. It's probably just a matter of time before he demands all interviewers prostrate themselves before him. Such arrogance!
IF: What is the secret to your winning smile?

JK: Winning? I don't know about that. Look, I think most New Zealanders don't care who has the best smile. They're more interested in the policies this Government has introduced to reward decent hard-working families, so that everyone can get ahead.
My, how he changed the subject quickly. He obviously sensed I was onto something.
IF:  When you die, do you think they'll deify you?

JK:  What, you mean make me a god? Are you seriously asking me that? Of course they won't. That's probably the stupidest question I've ever heard.
Methinks he protesteth too much. This revealed Key for what he really is  - a megalomaniac with a god complex. Beware, New Zealand, beware!
IF:  I think you're amazing and I want you badly. Do you sleep with other men?

JK:  No I most certainly do not!
There was anger in that response. The very thought of enjoying a loving relationship with another man filled him with hate. So he proved himself to be a homophobe of the worst kind.

I left my most brutal question to the very end, because I knew it would bring the interview to an end, but I wanted him to know he'd been through an ordeal of fire, and that I had his measure
IF:  I have to go now. Have you got the time? I have a bus to catch.

JK: Ten past five.
Well, Mr Key, your time is up too. As I left the interview I could see Key turning to his minders and henchmen with raised eyebrows. Then he began to shake his head. Clear signs that he knew the game was up.

Expect an announcement on Key's future in the next day or so. And remember who destroyed him. Only the greatest blogger in the world.

I've been told I should run for PM. The top job will be vacant soon. But the country's just too small for me.