Thursday, April 7, 2011

Here Comes Another Bailout

It’s difficult to know what to make of the government bailout of AMI Insurance. If this company really is going down the gurgler then the government probably has no choice but to step in and ensure policyholders affected by the February earthquake get paid out.

The alternative would be to let AMI fall over and tell thousands of people in Christchurch with damaged homes that it’s just their bad luck.

So once again the public may have to stump up to help out a failed company.

It is almost beyond belief that a major New Zealand insurance company could go bust in these circumstances. Sure, February’s quake was a big one, but scientists have been predicting for decades that our country was due for a big earthquake. Everyone just thought it was going to be Wellington rather than Christchurch.

So why didn’t AMI have sufficient resources and reinsurance to cover what surely can’t have been that extraordinary an event?

We are told again and again that the business sector does it better and smarter than government can. But when the business sector fails it’s all too often the government, and the taxpayer, left to clean up the mess.

It will take a lot to convince me there hasn’t been an utter failure of management at AMI. A failure that may cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of dollars. And yet you’d probably get good money if you were to bet that the current board and CEO will keep their jobs.

I don’t know much about the insurance industry or about the regulatory regime insurance companies operate under. But if these companies are too big to fail then we need to ensure they are being properly run. That may require tighter regulation of the insurance industry, so that this can’t happen again.

3 comments:

  1. Thankfully insurance companies will be under the supervison of the reserve bank as of next year, as will finance companies.
    The MED are the good folk who looked after finance companies and insurance companies, the same crowd who have taken 2.5 years to come up with nothing for the financial services hub. Useless they should merge it with Womens affairs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I heard the AMI management on radio today justifying the fact that they do not have two earthquakes worth of reinsurance. It was too "unlikely and unpredictable" to re-insure to that level.
    That does seem a bit ironic when their bedrock sales pitch to me, when I bought my house policy from them,was "prepare for the unlikely and unpredictable".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tom Scott on AMI
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/blogs/opinion/cartoons/1251886/Tom-Scott

    ReplyDelete

I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:

1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.