Thursday, April 21, 2011

Right Thinking: Just Say No To Your GP

Conservative columnist Dr Frank Shizenhausen injects some common sense into the immunisation debate.

Sir Peter Gluckman, the government's Chief Science Adviser, has bemoaned the low rates of vaccination in this country.

Well he would, wouldn't he? But I've always objected strongly to immunisation for the simple reason that I don't trust doctors.

I'll tell you why. Whenever you go to see your GP your visit's being subsidised by the government. That means you're effectively perpetuating big government each and every time you have a consultation over your hernia, your rasping cough, or your tendency to want to stab anyone who comes to your door.

And these doctors have got it so sweet that the more illness there is the more money they make.

I'm the last person to begrudge doctors the opportunity to make a living, but it's pretty obvious to anyone who cares to look at the evidence that doctors are the cause of most diseases. It can't be coincidental that wherever there is a breakout of some illness or malady, you'll find doctors. I'm sure if the self-serving medical profession would do a study on this topic, rather than wasting time making martyrs of people like the heroic Andrew Wakefield, we would find there is a correlation between the presence of physicians and the incidence of disease. Cause and effect.

So when doctors offer to stab our children in the arm with a needle, it's obvious to me that what they're really doing is planting little time-bombs in our kids. Bombs that will go off at a time of the doctors' choosing, leaving the entire populace at their mercy. I'm sure we'll later learn as our children flounder on their sick beds that only the doctors have the antidote, and that it is prohibitively expensive.

But the ultimate price for this immunisation drive may well be a surrender of our freedoms and liberties to a world government run by doctors, social workers and lesbians. Is that what we want for future generations?

That's why I'm saying no to immunisation. You should too.

4 comments:

  1. But Frank ... it goes deeper than you think!

    http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/profitable-depopulation-plot-links-jp-morgan-chase-and-goldman-sachs-to-vaccination-contaminations-by-dr-len-horowitz/

    ReplyDelete
  2. I seriously hope you're being tongue in cheek (I'm new to reading your blog. so haven't quite caught on to your sense of irony or sarcasm yet).

    If this is serious, then that that has to be one of the most idiotic rants I've seen in a while. And I've seen a few.

    Yes, there are issues with our health system and the way in which things are funded. And yes, the fact that doctors have felt a need to introduce 'evidence-based medicine' into their vocabulary should be of considerable concern.

    HOWEVER - immunisation is one of the things they've got right. *If you're being serious*, then this is one of the most irresponsible entries I've seen in a long, long time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, and before you bring up Poul Thorsen - he was a minor player in the research that he supposedly headed (he didn't head the Denmark study; he was a small, minor author).

    Sorry to spam your blog, but this anti-immunisation hysteria really, really, really gets on my wick.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Actually, I'd like to retract all the above. Um, my bad. Thought you were another anti-immunisation nut.

    ReplyDelete

I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:

1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.