Tuesday, June 5, 2012

We Need To Get Past This, Martyn

Have you ever been involved one of those endless disputes on the internet that you just can't seem to escape? It's like one of those schoolyard fights where the first person to walk away and say they've had enough is labelled a coward and loser by the other, even if the reason why you want to walk away is because the other person is talking gibberish, and because it is three in the f**king morning and you just need to sleep. It's okay to sleep sometimes.

I have not yet reached that point in my exchanges with Martyn Bradbury, but I fear things are escalating. To recap, he wrote a post about me, I wrote a post mocking him, we had an exchange on Twitter, and now he has written another post about me. My immediate reaction is to want to taunt him further, particularly with regard to his claim that Cameron Slater is my new best friend (a claim that anyone who actually reads my work will find as entertaining as I do), but I suspect that lefties labelling each other as friends of Slater may be something similar to the phenomenon known as Godwin's Law.

Ironically, I was engaged in drafting a legal settlement agreement when this all erupted, so it got me thinking. Surely we can settle this dispute and save ourselves all a lot of bother and boredom. It seems a more attractive proposition than our continuing this stoush, which would inevitably involve either a point by point rebuttal of Bradbury's dubious claims, or another post poking fun at him, which would in turn draw forth more incoherent rage from Bradbury.

I also seem to have stumbled into some kind of anti-The Standard thing, and Bradbury seems to be particularly put out that some of my posts occasionally appear on that site. I suspect one could devote quite a lot of time forming a theory on why Bradbury is quite so fixated on The Standard, but it's a fight I don't want to get involved in. The Standard folk asked me if they could occasionally syndicate my posts and I said sure, fine. I never asked them to do anything for me.

But all this is beside the point. I don't appear to have the rage Bradbury does (which again, I won't speculate about), which is why I am offering the hand of peace.

So Martyn, if you will sign and return to me the below settlement deed, I'm sure we will both put this behind us.

Bradbury v Yorke

39 comments:

  1. Please poke some more fun at him...please..my new BFF

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually Scott, I think you win. Martyn has neither the wit nor the good humour to best that effort...a Deed of Settlement that is mocking in the utmost...awesome work...

    Now get back to silly cartoons mocking me please.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brilliant. You win. As if you wouldn't have anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Martyn's just jealous that he continues to slide down the Open Parachute blog rankings. He's had a whinge to the very reasonable Ken at OP (am I breaching your agreement by calling it a "whinge", or should I just say that in the best traditions of Monty Python that he wished to register a complaint?), so perhaps he thinks that by piggy-backing on The Standard you're getting an unfair advantage over him. Ironically, I haven't seen IF appear on the rankings at OP, so that's a moot point as you lawyer fellas say.

    But seriously; don't lose any sleep over Martyn Bradbury, This riposte is excellent, and as Mr Slater would say, NFWAB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. am I breaching your agreement by calling it a "whinge"

      Definitely not, plus the deed hasn't been executed yet.

      Ironically, I haven't seen IF appear on the rankings at OP

      That would be because I have never got around to giving OP access to my blog stats.

      Delete
    2. You should take a moment to do that; beating Martyn in the monthly rankings would be far more satisfying than feather dusters at 10 paces!

      Delete
    3. I'm happy with my steadily increasing readership, but blog rankings sound too much like pissing contests. Popularity is no guarantee of quality.

      Delete
  5. You want to be careful with mixing it up with that Tumeke! lot, the last Labourite to try that got a axe in hwer window and you never know if Bomber might go all troppo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite so Sanctuary; Mr Selwyn did time for that IIRC

      Delete
    2. We mustn't write such things about Bradbury. I'm trying to bring peace...

      Delete
  6. I don't think Martyn can even read that without assistance.
    A total owning and Keeping Stock is correct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's an outrageous accusation, we all know he reads blog posts on Radio New Zealand...or rather that he used to read blog posts on Radio New Zealand.

      Delete
  7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0la5DBtOVNI

    ReplyDelete
  8. How can Martyn Bradbury be sure that Scott and Whaleoil haven't been calling each other and discussing how to upset Martyn?

    (apologies for repost, have used pseudonym)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So what if we have...not that we have, but so what if we did?

      Delete
    2. An intriguing thought. Alas, I have never spoken a word to Mr Slater, don't have his phone number, have never emailed him, and (with all due respect to my newest friend) probably won't be making contact any time soon.

      Delete
  9. Very funny Scott. Mind if I plagarise your deed? I particularly like the novel proposed use of feather dusters as dueling equipment. I can think of many situations where this could resolve some legal disputes in an appropriate way ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Be my guest. If I can bring just a little bit of peace to the world then my time on this planet will have meant something...

      Delete
    2. Make sure to protect the intellectual property on that Deed of Agreement Scott; I can see it becoming a hot item!

      Delete
  10. Have you sent one to Judith, Andrew and Trevor? Be a lot quicker and cheaper than bunging up the Courts with senseless writs.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm still proud to support the People's Front of Judea.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Came here via Whale Oil. Who are you? Why should I give a toss?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do me a favour and go back there, unless you're prepared to provide something more intelligent.

      Delete
  13. Has he signed and returned the deed yet?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm guessing he ain't signing (see update)...

    http://tumeke.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/scott-yorke-becomes-cameron-slaters.html

    But hey, he spelled Scott's name right!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh dear, perhaps the terms and conditions of the Deed were too complex for the poor wee petal to understand.

      Comprehensive blog victory to Scott...well done that chap...[golf clap]

      Delete
    2. Even Trevor Mallard calls it a win for Scott:

      Trevor Mallard ‏@TrevorMallard

      Blog wars can be funny - this is probably the best in NZ to date. Well done Scott... http://fb.me/16WAIjyWW
      Collapse

      Reply
      Retweet
      Favorite

      8:12 AM - 7 Jun 12 via Facebook · Details


      Game; set; match...

      Delete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Next time you feel like posting here please read my comments policy first.

      Delete
  16. Given the precedent nature of the material I trust it only took you two billable units to complete that as well.
    The terminal problem with Martyn is he is so dumb he does not know he is dumb.
    Always good that he is reminded when too dumb. Well done.
    An appearance on Cit A next then?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I notice this post has more than 30 comments, the equivalent on Tumeke has 1. Admittedly, some of these comments are by the author, but still, that seems like a fairly good yardstick for judging the winner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This focus on "winners" and "losers" is emblematic of all that is wrong with our legal system. Instead of treating this as a zero-sum game, why don't Skott and Martine harness the awesome power of Alternative Dispute Resolution to create a win-win situation?

      For instance, by combining their blogs into "Tumeke! Fish" they could both increase their traffic. And think of how the content would be enhanced if they took turn-about writing paragraphs in each post ... it would be like nothing else available on the web.

      See? A little lateral thinking, and what was a problem becomes an opportunity!

      Delete
    2. I'm not sure that the number of comments in a post is a useful gauge, otherwise David Farrar would be the world champion at everything.

      To be fair to Bradbury (and I am beginning to feel sorry for the chap), hardly any of my posts get more than five or six comments.

      I am told by others that Bradbury often blocks people on Twitter, so it's reasonable to assume he probably also deletes comments he doesn't agree with on his blog (I generally only delete spam and blatant trolls, and I don't get that many of either). Who knows how many people might have tried to comment?

      Irrespective of who has "won" or "lost" this engagement (I am far too modest to claim any sort of victory. There are no real winners in war), Tumeke is still a more widely read blog than this one. Which I'm fine with.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Mr Bradbury dislikes comments that dare to disagree with his views immensely. All posts go into automatic moderation and only show if he determines that they are not critical of him or, if they are, are so outrageous as to make him seem a moderate by comparision.

      Delete
  18. OK this one is genuinely funny. He's still not biting though, perhaps you need to add something about "nothing in this deed will be taken to imply that Martyn Bradbury has any respect whatsoever for Scott Yorke's opinions, writings or humour"... it seems like that's what's holding him back, judging by his response... pretty icey, I don't read your blog so can't say whether I agree that it's justified.

    I must say though, "he wrote a post about me" is going a bit far, it was more of a disdainful passing comment.

    ReplyDelete
  19. My favorite bit was..'Reeks of wannabe baby boomer mediocrity in beige'. I don't believe Martyn Bradbury has the slightest comprehension of how much damage he inflicts on the causes he purports to champion. All political blogs (make that all blogs) are the fleeting chattering of monkeys of course...

    ReplyDelete
  20. I particularly admire the "Duel" provisions of your dispute resolution clause - so refreshing from the usual mediation, blah, blah, arbitration etc etc. Looking to use these clauses myself in future - particularly keen to see certain clients armed with feather dusters. Are you open to waiving your right to attribution under the Creative Commons License? I am happy to provide coffee and a muffin at a cafe in town by way of consideration.

    Belinda

    ReplyDelete