I feel vindicated this morning.
If you ignore the fact that I said on the radio last week that we should never accuse anyone of being a drugs cheat without clear evidence, then I have been remarkably consistent in my claims that Nadzeya Ostapchuk is a drugs cheat.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
1 comment:
I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:
1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why do we need to ignore your statement on the radio last week? At that point, there was no hard evidence that Ostapchuk was a drugs cheat, so you didn't accuse her of such. Now there is evidence, and you are accusing her.
ReplyDeleteThat's consistent, isn't it?
The inconsistency lies in your repeatedly claiming without evidence that John Key is a serial killer who hides the bodies beneath his mansion's lawn.