If John Key is too gay for Helensville, just how much gayness would Colin Craig be happy with?
Craig is obviously offended by Key's "mincing", and by Key's support for the Marriage Equality Bill.
But how much gayness is Key allowed? For example, is all gay sex out, or just the sort that involves the removal of clothing? Is a dry hump permitted?
Monday, September 3, 2012
3 comments:
I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:
1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Colin should bear in mind that biologically speaking, there's little difference between a man's mouth, and a woman's. Also, that any hole's a goal.
ReplyDeleteWe have made progress,
ReplyDeleteas the National Party are now comfortable with a leader who minces,
Key is comfortable to support the Marriage Equality Bill and eventually Colin Craig will get it, gayness is okay.
Parliament will notice,[and many have]
that marriage is not a necessity in many young peoples lives any more.
Commitment can be a private and beautiful thing.
A bit of patty botty is OK - I mean the Aussie cricketers do it all the time and they're not gay.
ReplyDeletePink shirts are OK if that was a result of washing a white shirt with something red - that's not too gay for Helensville.
Dancing with transvestites isn't too gay per se, unless you know they're transvestites.