Since the right are trying to distract us all from the Dotcom clusterf**k by running Labour down, let's play the same game.
Matthew Hooton has ranked Labour's front bench, and not surprisingly he gives almost every one of them a savaging. Admittedly, there may be the odd kernel of truth in some of his comments.
But fair's fair. Let's do the same for National.
John Key, Leader - 3/10 John Key's leadership is looking increasingly shaky, and since the 2011 election he has floundered from one crisis to the next. Key blundered badly over the Teapot Tapes, and his decision not to sack John Banks looks like a major miscalculation. His failures in the Dotcom case and convenient memory lapses have eroded his credibility, and his pragmatic centrist approach towards politics that the public once loved him for is now being seen for what it always has been: a simple lack of principles. Increasingly gaffe-prone, and lacking any sort of plan for the economy, John Key appears to be on the way out. Will he hang around for the inevitable defeat in 2014? His ego probably won't allow it. Expect Key to be gone in 12 months.
Bill English, Deputy Leader - 1/10 Four years into National's reign, English is still blaming the stuttering economy on Labour. It is clear that English hasn't the faintest idea how to get sustainable growth into the economy, because the narrow ideological mindset he operates within doesn't allow him to look for other options. It's easy enough to blame the global economy for our woes, but we have had a record commodities boom and still we are struggling.
Steven Joyce - 3/10 Joyce talks a lot, but mostly about why the opposition parties haven't got a clue. Apparently because to otherwise discuss National's plan's for growth and economic development would highlight the fact that there really isn't much there beyond "build more roads". Touted as a future National Party leader, but only by those who have never had to listen to one of his speeches.
Judith Collins - 5/10 Collins talks tough, but is also prone to the occasional disastrous lapse in judgement. Her decision to suing Trevor Mallard and Andrew Little for defamation looks increasingly like a spectacular miscalculation. She has performed reasonably well in her portfolios, although she is struggling with the ACC mess she inherited from the woeful Nick Smith. One of the better performers, but will she have a shot at the leadership when Key bails? And will her ambition prevent her from staying loyal as the wheels begin to fall off the National machine?
Gerry Brownlee - 0/10 Increasingly despised by the folk of Christchurch for his arrogant musings and disdain for local democracy, Brownlee is a walking disaster. He needs to be kept well away from the public.
Tony Ryall - 6/10 Best known for being a micromanager who drives the people he works with to distraction, Ryall has nevertheless managed to keep the usually troublesome health portfolio off the main pages of the news media. For that alone he deserves much credit. National's most capable performer.
Hekia Parata - 0/10 The gift to the opposition that keeps giving, zero seems like too high a score for this crisis on legs. Who would have thought teachers would now be looking back fondly at the last education minister? Parata combines a considerable lack of ability with a fearsome arrogance. She knows almost nothing, yet she knows she's right. It will be a miracle is she isn't found another job (High Commissioner to Niue?) very soon.
Chris Finlayson - 3/10 Despite being Attorney General, Finlayson has been happy to go along with National's questionable and controversial law changes, including the extraordinary powers given to law enforcement agencies under the new Search and Surveillance Act. A prickly character who enjoys putting others in their place, Finlayson's sense of self-regard is probably not an asset as far as the voters are concerned.
Paula Bennett - 1/10 Bennett barely held her seat in the 2011 election, a sign that more and more people have seen through this self-styled "Westie Chick". A former beneficiary who used government money to get ahead, she now seems intent on denying others the opportunities afforded to her. Bennett appears to have no tools in her arsenal beyond cracking down on beneficiaries whose lives are already hard. She is also happy to ignore privacy laws where it suits her political agenda. This bully will probably lose her seat in 2014.
David Carter - 1/10 Largely invisible.
(Yes, this is a highly partisan post. That was kind of the point. My only regret is that I wasn't paid by a newspaper to write it.)
Sunday, October 7, 2012
18 comments:
I welcome comments, but I ask commenters to follow a few simple rules:
1. I delete anonymous comments. Please use either a name or moniker. I am not asking anyone to reveal their secret identity. Just don't call yourself "Anonymous".
2. Please don't abuse or defame others.
3. Moronic or nonsensical comments may be deleted.
4. I don't often exercise the heavy hand of censorship, but I do reserve the right to delete any comment I don't like, for any reason.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Parata combines a considerable lack of ability with a fearsome arrogance. She knows nothing, but she knows she's right.
ReplyDeleteAll of the paid columnists in the Herald and NBR have not said anything more accurate so succintly.
I rewrote that bit after posting. Should have left it as it was...
DeleteI fear that we had the same idea - I promise not a case of plagiarism:
ReplyDeletehttp://robertwinter.blogspot.co.nz/2012/10/grading-national.html#comment-form
I think you over rated Brownlee
ReplyDeleteActually the nats are doing well. I have not worked for 15 years and was a bit worried in 08 when they got elected that I might be forced to get a job, but I have survived all attempts so far. Why should I work when other when provide for me and me kids?
ReplyDeleteI haven't worked for years either mikey. I had to get out of ChCh in a hurray after the earthquakes though as it looked like there were going to be too many jobs going and I might have been forced into work.
ReplyDeleteGet on the invalids benefit as a drug addict and you are set for life. It really is paradise this country of ours.
ReplyDeleteOr you could get on Helen's Arts benefit. as long as you draw a picture once a year you stay on the benefit and cream it while all the suckers go off to work.
Deletehi guys, I haven't worked for 30 yrs. It sure is a great little country when you can bludge for life.
ReplyDeleteGet a volunteer job at a foodbank, an hour a month. I haven't bought groceries for 25 years.
ReplyDeleteIf Hekia Parata's job is to undermine Education and cause loss of confidence in our schools and in teachers then she is doing her job extremely well. 10/10
ReplyDeleteJust what Key wants.
National toadies will be advocating taxing my Bingo winnings next.
ReplyDeleteGood lord Scott, the angry trolls have coming buzzing from their hive (if I may mix my metapors) at this one!
ReplyDeleteSomeone liked to this post on a TradeMe forum. I guess it's a different crowd there.
DeleteWhere's Wally, sorry, McCully?
ReplyDeleteWatch how my hair flicks when I bang my ears from shoulder to shoulder.
ReplyDeletePlease note: I delete anonymous comments.
ReplyDeleteYou comment: "...and [John Key's] pragmatic centrist approach towards politics that the public once loved him for is now being seen for what it always has been: a simple lack of principles."
ReplyDeleteechoes this paraphrased quote from Mr Key in Adam Dudding's Sunday Star Times 2011 profile of the PM:
So yes, he says, the day may eventually come when his proudly worn labels of pragmatist and non-ideological get reframed in the public eye as wishy-washy and doesn't believe in anything."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/5601825/A-prime-ministers-view
Perhaps that day has arrived?
I'm not sure about that, but it seems Mr Key's personal credibility is taking a pounding with the 'haven't read it', 'don't have the detail' and repetitive 'don't know, don't recall' refrain.
Certainly, in some quarters of the news media the honeymoon is well-and-truly over.
The tricky thing for your party, Labour, is maintaining an appearance of unity and credible government in waiting while experiencing the natural and to-be-expected shake-ups, rationalisations and re-groupings of a couple of terms in Opposition, and stubbornly low public support showings.
That, and not being out-shone by The Greens.
- P